Talk:Bioparco di Roma

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bioparco di Roma article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rome

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Bioparco

Bioparco is the common name, politically correct, for zoo; so I think the article could be move to Bioparco of Rome or Bioparco (Rome), since every italian city potentially can have a bioparco. Mac9

Agreed, I had originally named the page Bioparco Rome, but it was moved. I will move it back to its intended title. - Gilliam 10:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bioparco II

The text suggests, that "biopark" is a completely new concept and totally different from a classical zoo. If this is so, please inform about the actual differences, as the article withholds this information. Or can it be, that it is just a name, in no way different from any other zoo, and the text has just been translated from the it:WP, which is more or less a commercial for the Rome Zoo, and has been given no further thought? --A bougainvillea preguiçosa (talk) 13:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the section you are referring to, and did a quick look on the Gilman Foundation Web site, but can't really figure out what "based on the principles of the Gilman Foundation" might mean, unless they are referring to a new focus on conservation (which is hardly unique among zoos). The zoo site is not any more helpful (though maybe it would be if I could actually read Italian). I've made some minor edits to get rid of peacock words and convert units, and added the current land area, but have left the questionable section alone for now. They did something in the late 1990s, and it would be good to eventually figure out what that actually entailed. As for "not given any more thought, that's probably true. I have done some work on the infrastructure of the article, but have not done any real editing, nor has anyone else since it was created. You are, of course, welcome to put some of that thought into the article if you are so inclined. Don Lammers (talk) 13:26, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bioparco di Roma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bioparco di Roma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425155218/http://www.bioparco.it/english_site/the_bioparco/1911_2011_100_years_of_history.html to http://www.bioparco.it/english_site/the_bioparco/1911_2011_100_years_of_history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bioparco di Roma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AsJDV3Pn?url=http://static.touring.it/store/document/21_file.pdf to http://static.touring.it/store/document/21_file.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]