[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Talk:Bistrița

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Does Romania not do demographics or what?  :) -208.126.51.56 (talk) 03:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "It is speculated that both bells residing in the tower ... might have melted." Surely whether the bells melted is not open to speculation. 82.36.129.101 (talk) 03:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bistrița. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bistrița. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should politicians be listed in ‘Notable People’?

[edit]

Should politicians be listed in ‘Notable People’ even if their only notable thing is being born and elected?

In that case, should we add all politicians from a city/province as to be equidistant and non-discriminatory?

I think Wikipedia is apolotical and thus not the place for such low political promotion. Kowalksi (talk) 07:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What makes ‘Daniel Suciu’ a notable people? Could the editors who keep adding him explain themselves?
”Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline.”
”Notability is not temporary;“
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians_and_judges
If ‘Daniel Suciu’ is a notable person then we should add all the hundreds of politicians that Bistrita had in the last 200 hundred years, at least. Remember that “Notability is not temporary”. So, if he is “notable” today he should still remain so in 200 years. I’m not kidding with the above. If you set such a standard I’ll take it upon myself to add all those elected politicians that meet the same “criteria” you set for Daniel Suciu.
If Wikipedia is to become the swamp of lists with politicians for the ‘Notable people’ list of a city, then let’s go all the way.
So, in repeating myself, what makes ‘Daniel Suciu’ a notable people? Could the editors who keep adding him explain themselves? Kowalksi (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
”The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians … who have held … national … office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels.”
That’s the end of this debate, now go find something else to do. — Biruitorul Talk 20:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page has multiple general criteria that must be met before meeting the profession criteria. Don’t cherry pick what you like only. Kowalksi (talk) 06:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He’s notable. If you disagree, nominate for deletion. — Biruitorul Talk 09:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bistrița&oldid=1198542462"