Talk:Gibson G-101
Gibson G-101 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 2, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
November 2010
[edit]"The G-101 can also be heard on The B-52's song "Rock Lobster""
This is not right. It doesn't sound like a G101, it sounds 100% like a Farfisa Compact. The G101 and Farfisa Compact have some optical similarities, this may be the cause for the confusion.
Here you can see that it's a Farfisa Compact (at 4:50 - 4:54) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UqKRGW6_rw
I also don't think that the organ in Devo's "Whip it" is a G101 but the sound isn't very characteristical so it could come from many organs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.1.92.15 (talk) 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- The B52's used a Farfisa Combo Compact Deluxe. See the Farfisa article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gibson G-101. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100316044924/http://homepage.uab.edu/moudry/disc_b.htm#35. to http://homepage.uab.edu/moudry/disc_b.htm#35.
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Gibson G-101/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 18:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm happy to start reviewing this article. I'll use the table below. Comments will appear soon! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 18:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Ritchie333, I'm putting this article on hold so you can work through my comments. To be honest, the only thing I'm concerned about is the copyright tag on the Manzarek image, mainly because I'm not too familiar with how US and other countries' copyrights interact. Hoping you may be able to help out here. Other than that, the article looks good and I hope my suggestions are pretty self-explanatory! If you have any questions just give me a shout. Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 11:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Production
Features
Sound
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections
Layout
Words to watch
List incorporation
Fiction
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Lenhoff & Robertson, 2019
Combo Organ Heaven
G-101 Gibson Portable Organ Service Manual
Vail & Carson, 2000
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
|
Replies
[edit]- "Wikilink "foldback"" Neither term listed in foldback (disambiguation) is appropriate here; this is a very specific term limited to a few musical instruments
- "Maybe wikilink "rocker switches" to "rocker switch"? (Redirects to "switch")" I don't this that's appropriate
- "Wikilink "TRS jack" Changed to "jack plug", TRS is a technical term
- "The expression pedal is important" Changed to "required"
- Reverb units - I've reworded this to more closely align with what the source says
- "Should the reference here be for pp.197-199?" - yes that's a typo
- "Can't see from the source specifically that the G-101 can be used to simulate the performance?" - as it's going off-topic, it doesn't really matter (after all, I can probably simulate the sound on a Nord Stage or Logic Pro X as well)
- Combo Organ Heaven - see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371#Combo Organ Heaven "Is it a respected source in the world of combo organs?" - yes, see Lenhoff / Robertson p. 166
- "There doesn't seem to be any mention of the G-202 in the source cited?" - because it's a typo of G-201
- "Putting the word "photo-cell" in quotes implies that it is a direct quote from the source but I can't see it anywhere." - replaced with photodetector
- Manzarek image - I have no idea, I just cropped it from an existing image uploaded by Clausule in 2010. Off topic, I'm also interested to know why it's being used in List of Polish people
- Thanks, benefit of the doubt - let's leave it.
All other issues I've addressed by directly copyediting the article so the problem no longer exists, or I have simply agreed with the assessment and made the recommended changes. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Ritchie333, thank you for addressing my comments! Only a couple remain, I've crossed out everything that's been completed. Hopefully it's all self-explanatory. Feel free to strike anything through that's completed. Many thanks! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 19:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- "I'm not sure that "trumpet" should be linked to the article about trumpet the musical instrument." It's not, it's only a mnemonic for organ players to make them know roughly what sound to expect
- "Not sure if linking to blogs is common practice." If the blog contains useful information, alongside information backed up in sources, it can be a useful bit of extra reading. Most sites like this don't mean to make any mistakes, they might just do accidentally, but as they are external links and not references, discretion is left to the reader.
- Unfortunately I don't have any free samples of a G-101 anywhere
I think those are all the points addressed now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)