Talk:Google Health

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Health and fitness

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Google Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Release notice

Google Health is now public. This redirect should be changed. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.57.245.11 (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first official sign of Google Health has been released. The redirect on this should be moved soon.

I replaced the redirect with a new article, but it's still pretty bare. Please help contribute! -Clueless (talk) 04:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intended audience

Is this article intended to address consumers, providers or developers? I'd like to add some things about the way the service works but I'm not sure how specific I should be. Cosmo7 (talk) 15:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link for Source?

The URL provided for [2] or "However, it does encourage users to set up profiles for other individuals." now redirects to "What's New" on google health, which has nothing related to that statement in the wiki page, so I'm assuming a new citation is needed. I'm new to editing wikipedia articles, so I just wanted to bring this to someone's attention more suited to edit the page appropriately. Ludaligist (talk) 15:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to Past Tense Wording

Because Google Health has been euthanized (get it?), I'd thought I'd start working on some of the wording to at least make it consistent. I'll start work soonish JbTruthiness (talk) 04:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google Health has been given a 'blood transfusion': https://www.businessinsider.com/google-new-health-unit-fold-in-deepmind-healthcare-unit-2018-11 and 'resuscitated': https://health.google/ --94.142.77.80 (talk) 16:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This entire article needs to be rewritten, Google Health never "dissolved" in 2012 they just changed and the history is not found in this version of the WP article unfortunately. Lots of news stories in 2019 & 2020 about changes to Google Health. Jooojay (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made a lot of edits here today, please feel free to add a note here if you want to discuss the changes. Thanks, Jooojay (talk) 23:39, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Google Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120221213557/http://code.google.com/apis/health/ccrg_reference.html to http://code.google.com/apis/health/ccrg_reference.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing section about YouTube controversy

Hey there is a section about YouTube controversy, which is cited and well-worded. That being said, I don't see how it pertains to Google Health. YouTube is a distinct branch of Google. Surely we can agree that we can't cover all branches of Google in this article (although other articles on Wikipedia can). I think it's appropriate for the YouTube controversies section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Controversies Here's the content below which I'm removing,

"YouTube chief executive officer Susan Wojcicki announced efforts to connect people to trusted information about the coronavirus pandemic. This included a COVID-19 news shelf, with videos from health authorities and news organizations. YouTube also said they were consulting on an ongoing basis with health authorities like the WHO and local organizations like the CDC, the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, and India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, as well as expert medical and public health professionals, to design policies based on the latest science. YouTube updated its policies to prohibit content with harmful medical information, and removed over 200,000 videos for violating medical policies. [non-primary source needed]

At the same time, YouTube and other social media sites had been criticized by civil rights advocates and health experts. The Southern Poverty Law Center noted that hate groups and racist pundits had pushed misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic on mainstream social media platforms such as YouTube throughout the crisis, despite companies like YouTube’s parent company Google pledging to fight fake news about the virus. The SPLC pointed out that videos containing racist misinformation about COVID created by Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, a white supremacist organization, had been posted and disseminated on YouTube. The SPLC also noted that despite being banned from Twitter since 2018, American Renaissance’s YouTube channel and its 126,000 subscribers had remained, as of April 2020."

Christinejwest I appreciate you adding this content, and like I said I think the content itself is good, but hopefully you get my point. Let me know what your thoughts are if you please. Thanks :)

makeswell (talk) 17:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]