Talk:Glider competition classes

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the gliding project.

Is there any reason for the capitalizations?--Vierzehn (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC) Yes, the class designations are capitalised as they are names, not common substantives.Francisco de Almeida (talk) 14:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, then the M should be capitalized in "15 Metre Class" and the like, too. It would, of course, be "15 m Class" (unit symbols are case-sensitive), but that has no effect on spelled-out unit names. Why aren't they capitalized? Gene Nygaard (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If someone can write better about the outcome of WGC 2012 as the Open Class ships are concerned, please do. I think it is a remarkable development in the design... Szafranpl (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After a bit of research and adding (as a result) of some notes (BTW, please preserve them somewhere, it was a bit of work to collect) I think the history section of Open Class needs rewrite. EB28/29 is I think an extreme design, but it took 1. and 3. in 2010 WGC, so the opinion "extreme does not work" is not so clear anymore. Main train of thought as of now I think needs to be preserved as it is interesting and insightful (extreme vs practical), but the whole thing has to be written from 2012 perspective, probably reporting previous stereotypes. All in all, this is fascinating. Szafranpl (talk) 13:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is something wrong either with the reference or with the content. In the FAI sporting code, section 3, chapter 5 there is no mention of maximum all-up mass or maximum wing load. Is there any other references? is the mass limitation obsolete?Cormul (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glider competition classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205015245/http://records.fai.org:80/gliding/ to http://records.fai.org/gliding/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glider competition classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080621012626/http://www.fai.org/gliding/sc3.1.0 to http://www.fai.org/gliding/sc3.1.0
Corrected formatting/usage for http://records.fai.org/gliding/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]