Talk:Honda Civic (eighth generation)

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

JDM Civic is a rebadged Canadian Acura CSX?

"The Japanese-market Civic is in fact a rebadged Acura; Honda Japan chose the Canadian-designed Acura CSX as the template for the JDM Civic."

I read the sources but still find it a bit unfathomable for:- 1) Honda Canada to 'design the CSX from the ground up'; 2) Honda Japan to rebadge a Canadian variant for an important world car for JDM and other various export markets.

There's no mention of such 'design from the ground up' in Honda World press release for CSX.--North wiki (talk) 17:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honda Civic SE trim?

Is there an SE trim at least for Canada? Because I saw a Civic in Canada with an SE badge on the back. 173.52.164.129 (talk) 12:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Midsize?

on the information list on the top right of the page why does it say midsize when the Civic is a compact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.235.89.234 (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It says midsize because it is midsize. 04:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookster451 (talk • contribs)

Civic 2009+ dims wrong

Dimensions box says:

68.9 in (1,750 mm) (coupe)
69.0 in (1,753 mm) (sedan)
69.3 in (1,760 mm) (2006-08 hatchback)
2,046 mm (81 in) (2009- hatchback) <------- HERE

First, it is inconsistent - inches vs metric system.

Secondly, width of 8th gen of civic mod 2009 didn't change - it is the same. The length of 2.046mm (81 in) is wrong, and it states the width including mirrors. I would leave the same width for both pre 2009, and post 2009... unless I don't know sth :)

Model types ??

Main civic wiki page lists 10 model type codes. Eighth generation (2005–2011) – FD1 FD2, FD7, FA1, FG1, FG2, FA5, FK, FN, MK8

This page doesn't give any explanation what they are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.86.205 (talk) 09:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Honda Civic (eighth generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/vdp/articleId=107281/pageNumber=1
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150221215913/http://world.honda.com/news/2006/4060108COTYTOTY/ to http://world.honda.com/news/2006/4060108COTYTOTY/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]