Talk:Jessica Feshbach/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AGK [•] 14:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Covers all aspects of the subject matter.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Satisfies WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No images used, but none appear to be available.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Happy to give this article GA status. AGK [•] 14:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)