Talk:Kiryat Arba
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
section title change
[edit]The term legal status is ambiguous and does not properly represent the content of the section. The section does not discuss the status of the settlement under Israeli law, only under international law. I dont see why the title should be changed from an accurate one to a less descriptive one. nableezy - 14:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- "Legal status" does not necessarily imply Israeli law and a title is not meant to furnish details present in the text. The title is too long, distracting and dominant on the page, giving undue weight to the section. You used "legal status" on many other such articles. No need to make an issue of it here. --MichaelNetzer (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- I *think* I used legal status when the section discusses the status of the settlement or outpost under Israeli law as well as international law. Such as for outposts, which are illegal under Israeli law, or for settlements with illegally expropriated private Palestinian land, which is likewise illegal under Israeli law. But for sections that discuss the status of the settlement under international law, and only under international law, I used Status under international law. I dont understand why the title is to long, how it is distracting or dominant, or how it gives undue weight to the section. Unless you can actually substantiate these unsupported assertions I dont see a need to respond to them. nableezy - 18:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Violence
[edit]Given the long section on attacks on Israeli settlers, a presentation of Israeli settler violence against Palestinians is needed in order to avoid a biased article.
Some online sources:
- Humanitarian news and analysis - a service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs http://www.irinnews.org/report/80087/israel-opt-settler-violence-against-palestinians-on-the-rise
- B'Tselem http://www.btselem.org/video/2005/08/southern-hebron-hills-settler-violence-and-army-harassment
- Christian Peacemaker Teams http://www.cpt.org/es/node/9936
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Kiryat Arba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120111022800/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1176152784857&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull to http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1176152784857&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
misplaced antecedent
[edit]I think the last sentence (about the June 30 2016 attack) needs to be reworded: "The attacker also wounded a security guard who responded to the scene before being shot to death.[15]"
I think you mean that the attacker was shot to death, not the security guard. If that's correct, then try: "The attacker also wounded a security guard who responded to the scene before the attacker was /being/ shot to death.[15]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.22.50 (talk) 21:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
New important information
[edit]New important information about the illegality of Kiryat arba http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.733746 --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- And here you can read the article, even if you are not a subscriber, Huldra (talk) 20:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 July 2017
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please somebody revert this genius edit, since redundant category is already included in "Mixed Israeli settlements".--Boots Dawson (talk) 05:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Note: :Since the TrickyH's edit was in question here. Its best if the editor attends this edit request. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 06:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC).
Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit extended-protected}}
template. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)- Before I started adding this cat to pages that already included the subcats of "mixed" or "religious" settlements, I read through the H:CAT page and I didn't see any statement that a page shouldn't belong in both a subcat and the parent cat. I'm happy to be proven otherwise if I'm not looking in the right place.TrickyH (talk) 21:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kiryat Arba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070430171933/http://www.hebron.com/english/article.php?id=313 to http://www.hebron.com/english/article.php?id=313
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706021237/http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1671.pdf to http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1671.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901044340/http://www.hebron.com/english/ to http://www.hebron.com/english/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
There is no WP article on the biblical town, not even a proper paragraph here
[edit]This must be fixed. Arminden (talk) 10:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 January 2019
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As of October 30 2018, Eilahu Livman is the Mayor of Kiryat Arba Mordy613 (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Source? nableezy - 22:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 November 2020
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Instead if the words West Bank please write
Judea ir Judea and Samaria.. Although Samaria refers to the area north if Jerusalem Bigg5770 (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit extended-protected}}
template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Irrelevant statement.
[edit]It says that the international community considers the settlements illegal and that Israel disputes this. Although this is true it is irrelevant mentioning that statement in that place or in the article altogether. Jake pres (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- The view that this community constitutes a war crime is a significant covered in numerous sources, and as such we include it here. nableezy - 03:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- I am curious whether there exist references to Israeli disputation regarding the illegality of the settlements. Does Israel somewhere argue that the settlements are legal? John Tinker (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes of course. Israel divides settlements into two types: completely legal (most of them), and illegal (a few "outposts"). Settlements in the second class are regularly moved into the first class. In both cases, "legal" and "illegal" refer to Israeli domestic law; Israel doesn't recognise the applicability of international law. Zerotalk 03:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am curious whether there exist references to Israeli disputation regarding the illegality of the settlements. Does Israel somewhere argue that the settlements are legal? John Tinker (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class Israel-related articles
- High-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Jewish history-related articles
- High-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- C-Class Jewish culture articles
- High-importance Jewish culture articles
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles