Talk:Kiss of the Spider Woman (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

On 23 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Kiss of the Spider Woman (1985 film). The result of the discussion was not moved.

To anyone

Anyone watching this page? I'd like to expand it a bit on this, but I think the book would be better than the film to expand...Anyone know why he wrote the book? Frostickle 04:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

see Google. Luigibob 21:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kiss Of The Spiderwoman.jpg

Image:Kiss Of The Spiderwoman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Share a Brazilian prison cell?

Although the movie WAS filmed in Sao Paolo, Brazil, the plot makes certain that the two people who have the main roles in the film are sharing a cell together, this is true. One is there for being caught with a underaged homosexual teenager (played by William Hurt), and the other, is there as a political prisoner, played by Raul Julia. My point is that the film goes out of it's way not to name any specific Country where their crimes took place, as if to say, "someplace in a Country in South America..." I think it's misleading to say they share a Brazilian prison cell as a part of the plot, because having said this without references in the plot would render the statement libelous.--Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a long time since I saw this film but I do remember seeing a small Brazilian flag in it. I think it was in the scene in a prison office. As I watched it I suspected it was filmed in São Paulo. I recall seeing the flag as a background decoration confirming this in my mind. It might not be unusual though to have a Canadian flag in a picture frame at a prison office in the US. The country is not specified in the movie but it seemed to me it was Brazil. Skywayman (talk) 10:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since there was Portuguese writing (including copious graffiti) all over the place, I think there's no argument it was set anywhere but Brazil. Though this was a background feature, and not until the end (with his mother) did it occur to me that William Hurt's character was actually supposed to be Brazilian. — ˈzɪzɨvə (talk) 03:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexual man/transgender woman

I got a question: why were the pages of the book and movie edited within the last 1-2 years to say "transgender woman" instead of gay man, when the book never portrays Molina as transgender woman and Molina's notes directly contradict this further, by cementing Molina as a (predatory) gay man who's seeking refuge in womanhood(or further: victimhood of the romantic women he idolizes) instead of facing his own self.

On no page I can find an explanation or source, and it seems to be simply an edit made by someone due to the self referencial "she" or Molina's line of cutting "it" off if he could. Which strikes me as odd, since the first is nothing out of the ordinary in the scene for gay men, and the second a rare admission of guilt of his real self rather than a transgender statement.

Having studied Molina extensively, I couldn't recall any information about this that leads to a confirmation of said edit, which makes it seem hastily and unwarranted. Almost as if made by someone who misunderstood the material. If someone has clarification I'd be thankful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.11.74.229 (talk) 19:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The current summary says Molina is a trans woman, but it still uses male pronouns for the character. That should be edited for consistency (either way).CRBoyer 18:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Given that the new film hasn't even come out yet, this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss of the Spider Woman (film) → Kiss of the Spider Woman (1985 film) – There's an upcoming film that now has its own article. Georgia guy (talk) 11:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Do we usually have articles for movies that haven't even been filmed yet? See WP:CRYSTAL. 162 etc. (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
162 etc., we do have an article on the upcoming film. Georgia guy (talk) 17:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm asking if that is justified for a film that doesn't yet exist. 162 etc. (talk) 17:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:TOOSOON. When the main title header of Kiss of the Spider Woman (upcoming film) is moved to Kiss of the Spider Woman (202? film), this nomination can be reintroduced. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as too soon. -- Netoholic @ 11:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per WP:PRIMARYFILM partial disambiguation for films is verboten. Unless the upcoming film is deleted or moved back to draft this should be done now. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.