Talk:Large-scale brain network
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 September 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MarKelly94.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Clarifications
[edit]Isn't the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop also a large-scale brain network, in the same sense of the others presented here? And what about the Reward Pathway - and of course there are others as well. As far as I understand there is no clear-cut classification system (neuroscientists use pathway, circuit, network, and system interchangeably without ever bothering to make a proper classification), and the "large-scale brain network" is a class that one of you wiki editors came up with to introduce some order, which of course was a very good idea, but this should probably be mentioned somewhere (as I have never seen this class mentioned in any article or book), and also someone needs to give an overview of the whole hierarchy: neuron->pathway->circuit/network(I guess the two are predominantly equivalent)->LSBN->whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:5019:2600:D4F3:C9EE:9ACF:4821 (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- Large-Scale Brain Networks are a relatively discovery in neural science. You can learn more about them if you use Google Scholar, or scientific journals. MarKelly94 (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Move some stuff from Biology_of_depression??
[edit]This section has a lot of good information, but, it is written with a focus on depression. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_of_depression#Large-scale_brain_network_theory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodysurfinyon (talk • contribs) 21:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Another set of slightly different networks
[edit]http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19250 primary sensorimotor cortex, primary visual and extra-striate visual network, fronto-parietal lateralized networks, default mode network, attentional frontoparietal networks, executive control, auditory networks, hippocampal and thalamic formations. These are not the same labels as in the image, which were: Somatosensory, DMN, Attentional L & R, Hippocampal, Visual, Thalamic, Associative, Executive, Auditory/Language.
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011 - shows ICA parcellations of 7 & 17 networks.
Bodysurfinyon (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Task Positive Network
[edit]I removed these two sentences about the task positive network. This is an alternate model of the large-scale networks that has it's own page.
Two large scale brain networks, namely the task-positive network and the default mode network, appear to be anti-correlated. In other words, when either of these large scale brain networks are activated the other large scale brain network demonstrates diminished activity.[4]
Additionally, competition between the task-positive network and the default mode network at the time of memory encoding has been shown to result in poor long-term memory consolidation in healthy controls.[6]
Bodysurfinyon (talk) 02:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
components of memory is not directly related to brain networks
[edit]There are also models suggesting that “components of memory representation are distributed widely across different parts of the brain as mediated by multiple neocortical circuits”.[1] Bodysurfinyon (talk) 03:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Ofengenden, Tzofit (2014) Memory formation and belief. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 7(2):34-44 http://www.crossingdialogues.com/Ms-A14-03.pdf
Common network names vs. the anatomical names
[edit]I am swapping the anatomical and common names in the headings, because that is how they appear in the literature most often. This quote is from the Uddin paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325607/
In our proposed taxonomy, networks are referred to by anatomical names that best describe six ubiquitous large-scale functional systems. The names in blue refer to the broad cognitive domains with which a given anatomical system is most commonly associated. Bodysurfinyon (talk) 17:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The Workgroup for HArmonized Taxonomy of NETworks (WHATNET)
[edit]Controversies and current progress on large-scale brain network nomenclature from OHBM WHATNET: Workgroup for HArmonized Taxonomy of NETworks, Lucina Q. Uddin et al.
Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Preprints - says we need to wait to add WHATNET, but it is so cool...
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/25za6 Bodysurfinyon (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- The WHATNET authors put out a tools that helps correlate different atlases. This needs to added when it is published.
- A network correspondence toolbox for quantitative evaluation of novel neuroimaging results
- https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.17.599426v1 Bodysurfinyon (talk) 03:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)