Talk:Law enforcement agency

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oliviaquick1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge / redirect

Article now rewritten. Peet Ern (talk) 04:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

This page should be merged with / redirected to Law enforcement and/or List of law enforcement agencies. I can't see the point of this article. --Kevin23

There is no Law enforcement article; it's a redirect to police. I only noticed this article now, but after working on law enforcement articles for a while, this could be quite useful. "Police" is a pretty broad topic, and that article should reflect that, but there's a lot of material on law enforcement agencies specifically currently crowding that article that would make more sense here. If the police article ever gets done up to be adequately comprehensive, it would be huge unless it's subdivided. Just noticing from editors contributions as well, it seems to divide along these lines, i.e., some people are interested in police operations and organization (which could be covered here), while others are more interested in police issues. That said, I can't imagine that work will get done any time soon, at least til I get around to it (which might take some time), so for now, I'm indifferent to a merge, and see this merely as a placeholder for a future article. Bobanny 06:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bias - US outlook only - a rewrite ?

Article now rewritten. Peet Ern (talk) 04:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

It is probably unintentional, but the phrasing of some of the content is rather baised. For example, the statement, 'Even so, non-police law enforcement agencies exist outside of the US . . .', is not exactly Wiki or encylopaedic.

I suggest that the article be rewritten something like as follows:

A law enforcement agency (LEA) is a term used to describe an organisation that enforces the laws of one or more governing bodies, or actively and directly assists in the enforcement of law. In doing so, the LEA assists the governing bodies to govern their subjects. LEAs will have some form of geographic restriction on their ability to apply their powers. The LEA might be able to apply its powers within a country, for example the United States of America's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, within a division of a country, for example the Australian state Queensland Police, or across a collection of countries, for example Interpol or the European Union's Europol.

Many law enforcement agencies are Police agencies that have a broad range powers and responsibilities. Police agencies, however, also often have a range of responsibilities not related to law enforcement. These responsibilities relate to social order and public safety.

LEAs can be responsible for enforcing secular law and-or religious law, for example Sharia or Halakha.

LEAs can be responsible for the enforcement of laws affecting the behaviour of people, for example New York City Police Department, organisations and corporations, for example the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, and even the governing bodies they support.

LEAs which have their ability to apply their powers restricted in some way are said to have a defined jurisdiction. A LEA which has a wide range of powers but whose ability is restricted geographically, typically to an area which is only part of a country, are referred to as local police or territorial police.

The term 'law enforcement agency' is often used in the United States of America to refer to police agencies, but in most other countries the term when used formally includes many agencies other than only police agencies. 152.91.9.190 (talk) 06:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A rewrite done - hopefully it helpsPee Tern (talk) 05:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite in progress

Article now rewritten. Peet Ern (talk) 04:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

I am doing a major rewrite and restructure of this article. For the time being, if you have any suggestions or corrections to make, please post them here so that I can properly include them as I go. Pee Tern (talk) 21:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't read the article, but a couple of comments on the headings:

The tiny ones (level 6?) where the text is smaller than the body text do not look like headings at all.

Yep I know. I asked about this on the Wikipedia:Help desk#Why are level 5 section headings minute? Nothing really helpful yet has been provided . . . ? Pee Tern (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia standard is to not user Upper Case on Words in Headings, i.e., do not use upper case on words in hadings. Exceptions for place names, proper names, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RenniePet (talk • contribs) 18:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for the tip. Pee Tern (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rational vs. fractured

I am not sure what the difference between a rational and a fractured approach to law enforcement. Obviously, they are not opposites. the opposite of rational is irrational, and while the US law enforcement may not be as efficient or effective, the US approach is not unreasonable. The opposite of fractured could be unified, which the police in Belgium and Austria seem to be, as local and federal police are integrated. of course even though the US, Belgium, and Austria are all federations, the US is vastly different than the others, being much larger, and many more jurisdictions. The fact that you have 50 states, each state has their own judicial system and law enforcement system Rds865 (talk) 07:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The word used was rationalised, not rational, which is idiomatically quite different. However, after the prompting, and rereading, it could be construed as possibly POV, certainly possibly not a world view wording given the potential for literal rather than idiomatic interpretation. I have changed rationalised to relatively unified. What do you think? Peet Ern (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also

a Law enforcement agency (LEA) is an organisation that enforces the law.

Thx, Captain Obvious —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.140.233.179 (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Bias In Powers and law exemptions of a law enforcement agency

I think a quick read of this section tells the story on its own. There is a clearly negative tone - making it sounds as though all the police do is take away civil liberties. Even the title of the section draws some concern - in most states, the police are not above the law. The law provides for peace officers to perform their duties by providing exceptions. The current wording suggests that the police are exempt from the law. Anyway, just some food for thought. lesthaeghet (talk) 04:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070802135140/http://www.ramsi.org/node/16 to http://www.ramsi.org/node/16#law

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the table

Terms defined in this article
local police
international law enforcement agency
multinational law enforcement agency
federal law enforcement agency
federal police
national law enforcement agency
national police
religious police
police
military police
provost
gendarmerie
civilian police
secret police
state police

I removed this table. There was a hidden comment above it, "Place defined terms into the table below in the order in which they appear in the article. The reader can then sort the terms alphabetically if required". It seems to do the same thing as a table of contents, and the redundancy is confusing? The links were within the page, but they look like links to other pages. LagoonGoose (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lost my phone

lost my phone 2409:40E1:20:1A7F:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]