Talk:Puffery

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Announcement

Puffery changed from a redirect and defined by Disccomp 22:46, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The 18th century play The Critic contains a whole long amusing discussion of the various varieties of puffery: AnonMoos (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"I am, sir, a practitioner in panegyric, or, to speak more plainly, a professor of the art of puffing, at your service--or anybody else's. I will take upon me to say the matter has never scientifically treated nor reduced to rule before. Yes, sir, puffing is of various sorts; the principal are: the puff direct, the puff preliminary, the puff collateral, the puff collusive, and the puff oblique, or puff by implication. These all assume, as circumstances require, the various forms of Letter to the Editor, Occasional Anecdote, Impartial Critique, Observation from Correspondent, or Advertisement from the Party."

Example of Puffery in Italian?

I would think that it should have been very easy to find an example in English. Was there something special or meaningful about this particular example, or was it simply "thrown in" to have something instead of nothing?Jonny Quick (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]