Talk:Queen Jeongseong
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Queen Jeongseong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100721130710/http://www.xs4all.nl:80/~monarchs/madmonarchs/sado/sado_bio.htm to http://www.xs4all.nl/~monarchs/madmonarchs/sado/sado_bio.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring and citing sources
[edit]Please stop being rude to each other, and please cite your sources. For conflicting viewpoints, you can list both takes, while attributing the takes in-line to various sources. Example: "a source says that b happened, while c source says that d happened. There is conflict because of e, and f is at stake".
But most importantly, please cite sources and do not perform your own WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Only write analysis that comes directly from a scholar. Unsourced stuff is next to useless. toobigtokale (talk) 00:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Well said. The key step to improving articles (and winning disputes...) is finding and citing reliable sources. If folks keep edit warring about unreferenced content, per WP:V, we can just "solve it" and blank the related section. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)