This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
The terms "extremist", "terrorist" and "freedom fighter" should be avoided or used with care. Editors discussing the use of these terms are advised to familiarize themselves with the guideline, and discuss objections at the relevant talkpage, not here. If you feel this article represents an exception, then that discussion properly belongs here.
This article is an embarassment to Wikipedia. Does nobody know how to actually write an encyclopedia article? Here's a hint for you - it should be prose not a list. Possibly some people are not capable of writing prose, but that means leave it for someone else and not remove the essential cleanup tag. It also helps if you read the things you link to, Wikipedia:Manual of Style (embedded lists) says "Embedded lists should be used only when appropriate; sometimes the information in a list is better presented as prose paragraphs". This article is an inappropriate use of an embedded list, it should be prose. 2 lines of K30313:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If either were turned into prose it would be a right mess. Often when bullet-points are removed we end up with an awful mass of On 1 January 2010 X did X at a house in Derry. On 2 January 2010 X did Y at a house in Strabane. On 3 January 2010 X did Z at a shop in Letterkenny ... sentence after sentence.
Timelines such as this should be written in bullet-point form as it's the clearest way of presenting the information.
Encyclopedia articles should not be written as timelines. I realise that is all some people are capable of writing, but that does not make it correct. 2 lines of K30312:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree; the timelines look pretty bad and don't really add anything to the article. Also the mentioned Timeline for the RIRA is called Timeline of Real Irish Republican Army actions where as this is not meant to be a timeline, perhaps it's time to split the timeline away and let it stand or fall on its own merits? IRWolfie- (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]