[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Second Coming

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

most biblical sources irrelevant

[edit]

most biblical sources at the beginning of the article refer to assension to heaven or the kingdom of god, not the second coming. check them out. unless i don't know of some kind of connection between all those that makes them the same. even if some kind of logic makes the same it has to be addressed. without it, they are logically different things.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.76.99.106 (talkcontribs) 04:10, April 20, 2006

It is relevant because that was when He promised to return.

Imbalanced Representation

[edit]

Each paragraph outlining basic religious beliefs has at least a sizable paragraph summarizing the beliefs the religious set of ideas, with one exception. May I suggest adding a few summarizing points about the beliefs of the Latter-day Saint beliefs on the second coming, rather than leaving it saying that the Latter-day Saints have many notable distinctive and specific beliefs? Just because there are many differences in Latter-day Saint beliefs and the specificity of those beliefs does not mean that they are not worth summarizing as is done with every other group. I would suggest at least a few points so that readers have some idea of what those distinctions are, not just knowing that there is a distinction. If we're going for brevity, let's be brief across the board and say that each group simply has distinctive beliefs. I would be happy to attempt a Latter-day Saint summary if there is agreement. Thank you.

[edit]

Would someone with experience with {{bibleverse}} please fix these? They are in Second Coming#Terminology Second Coming#References as "(Stephanas, Fortunatus and Achaicus,[3] Titus,[4] and Paul the Apostle[5])". The links seem to work OK, but there is a big red "Template:Bibleverse with invalid book" which inhibited me from clicking on the link. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic view.

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_Jesus%27s_death#cite_note-Reynolds_2009-3 is a good source that the second coming is believed in amongst us Muslims too. It is also found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_Jesus%27s_death#:~:text=Unlike%20the%20Christian%20view%20of,Coming%20in%20the%20End%20days.

2001:8003:2953:1900:5CDF:6EF1:F077:BE90 (talk) 02:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article already has a section on the Second Coming as it relates to Islam. If you would like to add information, feel free to do so. pillowcrow 20:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Presence (Greek: parousia ) of Christ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 4 § Presence (Greek: parousia ) of Christ until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]