Talk:Sketchfab

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Growth figures

The § Growth section tabulates and graphs the growth in numbers of users and models (product) over the last decade. I have two questions about their notability, and a technical one:

Are these growth figures particularly notable? What proportion of the market do they represent?
These growth figures seem to follow the normal exponential growth of any product in its infancy, before market maturity flattens the curve to a characteristic sigmoid (S) shape. How mature is this market?
Both graphs are of the same type (line); each has ten data points over about seven years; each uses a similar date xFormat (either %Y or %Y-%m). Yet the second graph tries to mark 17 ticks along the x-axis, whereas the first marks only seven. Is there a problem in the {{Graph}} template that causes this odd behaviour?

yoyo (talk) 14:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The graph were just an attempt to represent data scattered across a lot of articles in a concise way.

The growth does not follow "the growth of any product". Not all products see an exponential growth over a 10 year period.

It's hard to say what is the company's market share in terms of users without a proper market sizing analysis.

The graphs have recently been deleted anyway. So we can close the discussion. Pannini (talk) 12:22, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

merge with Fab (website)?

Or should this be a historical article? Arlo James Barnes 18:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given that no case has been made (that is, no reason given), and has had no support over the course of many months. Klbrain (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair, but on the other hand for most of those months the Epic Games Fab wasn't yet accessible. 50.236.244.118 (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]