Talk:Sioux Quartzite

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Sioux Quartzite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Dakota C‑class Mid‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History and organization

Since the Sioux Quartzite was historically important, a couple of us are talking about adding a section on that. What I propose for the organization is:

Lede, with a map I'll make based on the one in the field guide I use a source as the starting image
Section on geology (written)
Sections on history, both native and importance in South Dakota (and anything else that we dig up), with the current image from Sioux Falls, and hopefully one of a carved pipe, and others if there's space

It might also be good to have a section on the geography and glacial geology, as the prominent Coteau des Prairies (which contains Buffalo Ridge) is a major landform where the rock crops out.

Awickert (talk) 04:38, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do this weekend as far as the historical/economic side. Although I'm not a fan of sections that have been clogged with pictures, there is also a picture of the old Minnehaha County Courthouse at the Sioux Falls article. (I added the Federal building here as I thought it showed the color a bit better, but the other one is available if someone wants to use it.) The next time I'm in Sioux Falls, I'll try and get a picture of one of the modern quarries in either SF or the one near Dell Rapids. AlexiusHoratius 04:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - if we can find enough info, it shouldn't be hard to add it. Awickert (talk) ~05:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, it looks like I may have over-estimated the sources I had been planning to use in the section's expansion a bit - I'll try my best to find something that mentions the history/economic impact of the stone next time I'm in Sioux Falls. AlexiusHoratius 00:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Ma"

The mouseOver hint for "Ma" says "annum" -- shouldn't that be "Mega-annum"?

178.0.20.169 (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was rather unhelpful. Fixed for now by linking to specific section Year#SI prefix multipliers although now someone will likely change that header... Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 13:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sioux Quartzite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19981207003945/http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/beryl10/SiouxIntro.html to http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/beryl10/SiouxIntro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]