Talk:The Devil's Backbone

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Mexican / War

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Mexican cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copied Plot Section

The plot section is a nearly word-for-word copy of the featured review on IMDb. Therefore, the plot summary must be rewritten or deleted soon. G y re 01:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently added in a new plot summary section. It is lacking many details of the sub-plots, which has made completing the summary very hard! My last two "paragraphs" are awful! Help would be very much appreciated by anyone! -- It may be that those who do most, dream most. (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help no longer needed. Whilst I admit the last paragraph hastily throws things together, it's still an improvement. MwNNrules (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added in a much better plot summary. It is shorter, and more to-the-point. The first paragraph is about the main story, the second of the subplot, the third where they coincide. MwNNrules (talk) 21:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is with the 'symbolism' section here? It lacks any real examples, and is rather nonsensical without them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.97.230 (talk) 05:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The plot section is now a direct copy from Rotten Tomatoes - it even includes a link to the original! --84.249.247.6 (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:El Espinazo del Diablo (poster).jpg

Image:El Espinazo del Diablo (poster).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

trivia warning?

its stupid. The section title is trivia. and then it says, warning: containts trivia! No shit!

Yeah I guess. Anyways, it's gone now. I've incorporated some of the trivia material into other sections. It may be that those who do most, dream most. (talk) 20:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment evaluation request

I'd keep it at Stub given the current state, although it probably isn't too far from Start. There need to be more developed sections beyond Plot and Cast. You can expand the project banner above to see more thorough instructions on what is needed for Start. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 01:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As of April, it's now start. yay. MwNNrules (talk) 00:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need advice

I've been working on the infobox, trying to fill in all the blanks, but two have me stumped: for starters, does anybody know where to find the real budget? Mind you, estimated is okay, but I like specifics. Next: what do I put for the distributing section (not added yet), I know it was independently produced by Almodóvar, but is that what it's asking. MwNNrules (talk) 00:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

I have redone the cast section to match that of Pan's Labyrinth. And instead of casting by 'star power', I casted by the importance of their role, as judged by myself. MwNNrules (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response

Sadly, only American critics are quoted as if the rest of the world does not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrodesIII (talk • contribs) 01:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Information and Expansion

This article is not quite complete and is missing important information on the film's theatrical and home-media releases which needs to be added to the article. The production section of the article is also way too short and needs to be expanded with more information added to it. All of these changes need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]