Talk:Types of Women
Appearance
Types of Women has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 27, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text of Poem
[edit]I thought the version of the poem I added to the page was an old translation in public domain. I'll verify before adding one back in, but I do think that having the text will be helpful. —Zujine|talk 00:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Zujine, The text's source URL didn't mention that a date or a translator if I remember correctly. While I certainly agree that quoting is a really good idea, I'm not sure that Wikipedia (rather than Wikisource) is the best place to host a full translation? Anyway, if you can find one, I certainly won't remove it ;). Brigade Piron (talk) 18:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Types of Women/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Katolophyromai (talk · contribs) 17:27, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
I will review this article. I have read through it once and it seems to be a very promising candidate. --Katolophyromai (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
Comments:
- I have re-read the article several times over and the writing quality is clearly top-notch.
- The article is well-cited and contains plenty of references.
- The article provides an extensive overview of the poem in question.
- The article has no problems with POV; all of the opinions described in the article are clearly attributed to modern scholars and are not spoken in Wikipedia's voice.
- The article is completely stable. I could find no trace of edit-warring or vandalism in the recent article history and the content of the article remains consistent from day-to-day.
- The image of the archaic figurine of the pig is an excellent addition to the article, but, if you can find an image of a Greek manuscript of the poem itself, that might be a better image to use for the main image. The pig image might fit better in the "Content" section.
Overall, I think that this article is a clear and easy pass. It thoroughly addresses all of the GA criteria. If you think I have made a mistake and this article is not yet ready, please let me know. --Katolophyromai (talk) 01:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- GA-Class Greek articles
- Low-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- GA-Class Poetry articles
- Low-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- GA-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles