Talk:Unattractiveness
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sabrinajoy1020.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Seems petty... but "Internet" is a little old-fashioned
[edit]@Dimadick: I tried and failed to find specific Wikipedia policy regarding the capitalisation of "internet". However, in the article it is being used as an adjective: in this form it is often left uncapitalised. Besides, in non-American forms of English, "internet" is rarely considered a proper noun anyway. What was your reasoning in capitalising it? Thanks — Quasar G t - c 16:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Because the main article Internet defines it as a proper name and consistently capitalizes it, alongside ARPANET, CYCLADES, the Merit Network, the NPL network, the Tymnet, and Telenet. It is quite standard for network names. Dimadick (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
That doesn't really matter, as in the phrase "internet forum", "internet" is acting as an adjective rather than a noun. However, the article on Internet forums seems to prefer the capitalised version as well. Still seems a little old-fashioned, but hey. Quasar G t - c 17:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
"Celebrities" section
[edit]I've removed it, since it only referenced Buzz Nigeria, which seems to be some sort of celebrity gossip magazine and likely not a reliable source. Several of the people listed were living people, as well. I wouldn't necessarily be opposed if someone added a well-sourced analysis of the implications of lookism in celebrity culture, but in its recently reverted form it seems like nothing more than listcruft. --SamX 22:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class Aesthetics articles
- Low-importance Aesthetics articles
- Aesthetics task force articles
- Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles