Talk:Wit (play)

Spelling

7/28/06. The word resuscitation is mispelled is spelled in the last sentance. I could not correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runchummey (talk • contribs) 04:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC) (later I was able to edit)[reply]

I could not edit the word "asseses" to the correct spelling "assesses" in the first paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runchummey (talk • contribs) 05:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

Shouldn't the article summarize the play, not the film? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.6.4.154 (talk) 21:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking just that.

There already is a summary of the film on the page for the film.

Whoever wrote this article should rewrite that section to summarize the play, not the movie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Preston47 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, from the summary, I feel like there are some significant differences between the play and what happens in the film. Anyone else know? Hurrah (talk) 02:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, for the cast, shouldn't the original cast for the play be included instead of the characters from the film? Or does that not matter? Hurrah (talk) 02:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flatline

For the record, I would like to say that the Dr. did not "forget" about the "DNR" order, he tried to keep her alive for research, which made him look like an evil b!@#$%^ to EVERYONE onstage. just saw it tonight. Amazing show. Agreatguy6 03:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cast question

I have taken care of the cast issue, at least regarding the 1998 New York production. I have removed the cast of the film, per the above comments, as that is covered in the separate page on the film and is not needed here. I cannot find the original California cast on the internet, though. DJRafe (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Length

I recall reading that the original producing company demanded over an hour of cuts to get it into its current 90-minute, intermission-free form. Does anyone have any information about that? My sources would probably be play programs that don't pass WP:RS. My current boss was part of MCC at the time, so I could always ask her, but then it would be WP:NOR. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wit (play). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120611095518/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/166878-Broadways-Big-Night-Neil-Patrick-Harris-Hosts-66th-Annual-Tony-Awards-June-10 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/166878-Broadways-Big-Night-Neil-Patrick-Harris-Hosts-66th-Annual-Tony-Awards-June-10

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]