User:Ahdavis07/The Quadroons (short story)/Jaunarra Peer Review
Appearance
Peer review[edit]
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info[edit]
- Whose work are you reviewing? The Quadroons
- Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ahdavis07/The Quadroons (short story)
Lead[edit]
Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No. here is a background of the story. But not an actual lead to say hey, this is what this article is unless that is the background.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No, more detail could be added
Lead evaluation[edit]
Content[edit]
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes the content is relevant
- Is the content added up-to-date? Things are up to date.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? of course, there is more that can be added to go more into depth with the story
Content evaluation[edit]
Tone and Balance[edit]
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral? yes, it is not anything that is favored more
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? To be honest I did not see any claims
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the information given does make the story interesting and makes it a story that should be read.
Tone and balance evaluation[edit]
Sources and References[edit]
Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, it all has references.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes they do
- Are the sources current? I think they are current
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes the links work. They took me too the article or source that was used
Sources and references evaluation[edit]
Organization[edit]
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Very easy to read
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There were some grammatical errors
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The sections do reflect the title of the section
Organization evaluation[edit]
Images and Media[edit]
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned? So far, no images
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?no images
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? no images
Images and media evaluation[edit]
For New Articles Only[edit]
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes, there are more that 2-3
- How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Not too exhaustive. Enough to cover what they are using
- Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?Yes it does
- Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, it links to things that gives more information
New Article Evaluation[edit]
Overall impressions[edit]
Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? It added to it. It spiced up the story
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- How can the content added be improved? With more info and give the readers more than what is being given