[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User:Bradv/sandbox/Dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dashboard

[edit]

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 148
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 55
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 91
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 14
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 6
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 107
Requested RD1 redactions 5
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 22
Open sockpuppet investigations 134
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 7
Importance or significance not asserted 2
Possibly contested candidates 7
Other candidates 15
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 15 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Persistant sockpuppetry, edit warring and vandalism. Catfurball (talk) 17:57, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 98.185.164.204 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month in response to an AIV report. Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism / disruptive editing / addition of unsourced content in the last few days. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 05:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unsourced birthdate changes. Waxworker (talk) 01:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Article is a persistent target for vandalism by IP and new users. Happily888 (talk) 02:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: IP user vandalism, user not stopping or providing citation for his controversial edits Alawadhi3000 (talk) 02:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy🍁 02:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow burn vandalism, but protection might be warranted?. Knitsey (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism (likely sockpuppetry, due to similar edit summaries) from IP addresses since 19:08, 13 August 2024. Panian513 03:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 19:40, 21 August 2024. Panian513 03:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article seems to get targeted periodically by LTAs who have a bone to pick with Ponyo (the editor). It has been protected previously for the same reason. Proposing pending changes as semi-protection is likely to affect too many good-faith IP editors. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Lemonaka 03:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Evidently being targeted by a long-term abuser. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 06:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: The article was fully protected due to edit warring, but now that one of the editors engaged in the edit war has been blocked for two weeks, I believe the full protection can be lifted now. (There's also a bunch of complaints on the talk page.) Some1 (talk) 01:23, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: I think it's reducing the amount of edits needed to keep the page relevant and up to date. The game is changing daily, but it hasn't been edited in 2 days due to this unnecessary restriction. Daulton7996 (talk) 04:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Add the movie Stree 2 to the list, in the wikitable in the section List of highest-grossing Indian films#Highest-grossing films. The movie has earned a Box office Worldwide collection gross of est. ₹367.86 crore by August 21, 2024. As of 20 August 2024, the film grossed ₹317.83 crore in India and ₹50.03 crore internationally, for a total worldwide gross of ₹367.86 crore.[1][2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.128.53 (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ "Stree 2 Box Office". Bollywood Hungama.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. ^ Stree 2#Box office

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

8 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Editinginterface (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/MediaWiki (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
Big Brother 26 (American season) (request) 2024-08-23 06:08 Fully protected, expires 2024-08-25 at 00:02:52 UTC (log) Modified by Star Mississippi on 2024-08-18: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Shroud of Turin (request) 2024-08-23 12:12 Fully protected, expires 2024-09-01 at 01:25:53 UTC (log) Protected by Bishonen on 2024-08-22: "Edit warring / content dispute: Work out consensus on Talk, please."
Template:Blocked text (request) 2024-08-23 15:31 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
MediaWiki:Tag-possible vandalism-description (request) 2024-08-24 06:39 MediaWiki page (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
15 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection"
Module:Football box (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Football box collapsible (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida (request) 2024-08-12 23:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mifter on 2018-12-07: "Highly visible template"
Template:Contentious topics/page restriction talk notice base (request) 2024-08-13 06:09 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-15: "Highly visible template"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-08-17 15:53 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Country data Turks and Caicos Islands (request) 2024-08-18 05:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-20 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:MultiReplace (request) 2024-08-20 06:46 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikAnimal on 2017-10-09: "Highly visible template; 34,000+ transclusions"
Module:Track gauge/data (request) 2024-08-21 13:05 Template-protected (log) From Module:RailGauge/data: Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-10-17: "High-risk Lua module: template-protection is now the default for high-risk modules"
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-08-21 21:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-08-23 03:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox church (request) 2024-08-23 03:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2024-08-23 19:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Template:WikiProject Pakistan (request) 2024-08-24 03:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Fairly regular article creator and Did you know? contributor who appears to be familiar with the policies and guidelines surrounding notability and encyclopedic suitability. I don't believe it's a good use of NPP's time to be checking their creations. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Over many months has been creating appropriately concise articles of a consistent and appropriate format; I've reviewed several of them as part of NPP, and now think that the right is appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2012 and have created about 220 articles. Only three of those (that I recall) have ever had to be revised before they were accepted. Though many of my articles have not been rated particularly high on the assessment scale, I think that I am experienced & familiar enough with Wikipedia's policies that articles I create need not clog up the new pages feed. Best, JPRiley (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


I previously had the permission granted to me but I had my username changed a while back and never requested to have the permission back. So I would kindly like to have the permission back if possible! - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 00:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 23:57, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to see whether this tool can help with adding templates to talk pages currently missing "ArbCom_Arab-Israeli_enforcement" templates or the equivalents. Many pages are missing these templates describing the special rules that apply to the articles. Sean.hoyland (talk) 09:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([2]). MusikBot talk 09:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Good job bot. So, thinking I already had access once wasn't a false memory after all. Good to know. Sean.hoyland (talk) 14:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 23:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights

I am a contributor with a major focus on indigenous languages, Hausa, to be specific. I am requesting for this right so that I can have access of translating articles from English to Hausa. This is part of my passion for contributing to the largest repository of open knowledge in the world. I hope my request would be reviewed and kindly be approved. Thank you. Yahuzaishat (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
@Swarm translating pages FROM en to xxxx shouldn't require any permissions on enwiki. We do have an abusefilter about EC and WP:CXT, but it is about translating from xxx TO en. — xaosflux Talk 10:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Can you clarify? I considered this but was under the impression that access to the tool on enwiki would serve its purpose in the same way in any direction—and access to the tool was enabled by EC to begin with. That was my understanding based on the relevant docs. Is there a risk-benefit consideration or a meaningful difference in granting access to an editor intending to support a minor wiki? ~Swarm~ {sting} 07:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
@Swarm The content translation tool should be launched from the project you want to translate TO. The tool is "enabled" here for everyone, however publishing articles to this project are prevented by an abusefilter. That abusefilter is bypassable by extendedconfirmed users. No one should be attempting to publish any article here, on the English Wikipedia, in Hausa - thus why this doesn't make a lot of sense. Looking at the filter log of this requester shows they never attempted and were blocked to do CXT here, so I'm assuming they are just very confused. This requester seems to be publishing CXT pages to hawiki (example), and no account flags of any kind here on enwiki would have any impact on that (the workflow of which should start at w:ha:Musamman:ContentTranslation. — xaosflux Talk 13:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello! My account has been active for 30 days and I have over 500 edits, but I still am not an Extended Confirmed user. Is there something I am missing in order to be granted this status? Thank you! ILoveFinance (talk) 19:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Not sure what happened, but I just now got the tag added to my account. If that was someone here, thank you! My request is now complete. Thanks again :) ILoveFinance (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
 Already done (automated response) by ILoveFinance. MusikBot talk 20:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
@ILoveFinance think there was some sort of off-by-one thing, but this should now be done, see Special:UserRights/ILoveFinance. — xaosflux Talk 13:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! ILoveFinance (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

I was given a trial for a few months and would like to renew my permissions. I have made good use of my permissions by fixing new pages and judiciously applying CSD whenever necessary. I am still active at NPP and will continue to make good use of my permissions upon renewal. Florificapis (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 22:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Renewing the permissions for another two months, overall decent but there were enough reviews that I think were incorrect that I want to give feedback on and see improvement over before conferring full permissions  Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
  1. You rushed through 2 dozen different Polish dialect pages in under 10 minutes on July 25. While in general these articles seem to cite an authoritative source, more time should have been spent spot-checking controversial claims and verifying that the cited source actually contains significant coverage of the specific dialect in question and not just Polish linguistics more generally.
  2. Noel Hein does not cite significant coverage, and shows clear signs of UPE editing.
  3. Bad Shabbos does not cite significant coverage, although I was able to find some online and tag it with {{sources exist}}
  4. Kfar Devora's sources are for the most part not accessible, and it is an article that falls under WP:PIA and only cites sources affiliated with Israeli institutions. It should have at least been tagged with {{refimprove}}, and I was unable to quickly find sources that satisfy WP:GNG searching on Google Books and Scholar.
  5. Holy Resurrection Orthodox Church of Hakodate does not cite significant independent coverage, although I again was able to find some sources online and tag it with {{sources exist}}
signed, Rosguill talk 17:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback! Super helpful. This time around, I'll take a closer look at each article's sourcing and check if there are enough RS. I am now applying more generous use of {{refimprove}}, {{onesource}}, and other tags. Florificapis (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

I currently have probation AFC permissions; though I didn't review many articles, none of the accepted articles were deleted and I believe the declines were well reasoned. My main experience however is creating notable articles; I have created 70+ articles (including ones converted from redirects) on Wikipedia, none of which were deleted (only one was temporarily draftified, but is now back to mainspace and a GA). I have worked on multiple FAs and GAs. As such, I believe I have enough experience regarding the notability criteria, and I'd like to help reduce the backlog. Thanks! Skyshiftertalk 23:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Based on my experience with you, I'm very confident you'll proceed with the right level of cautiousness. Check out WP:NPPSORT, start in the area you're most confident in, and ask questions if you're at all unsure. Best of luck, thank you for volunteering, and please apply a week or so before your perm is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]


I'm an active AfC reviewer, and I spend a lot of time patrolling new pages. I often draftify articles that are not sourced or need additional sources (over 250 articles so far). Having this right would be super useful and help reduce the number of R2 tags for admins in the backlog. I also have experience in WP:RM, and I'd like to request page mover rights for non-controversial tasks. Thank you, Waqar💬 16:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

  •  Done - Iwaqarhashmi has built up a good dossier of requested move closes this year, is receptive to comments about said closes including relisting where appropriate, and has a clean record. No issues.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello@AlexBobCharles. Most of your history looks good. Could you explain why you warned rather than explained after [3] this edit? Seems like a good faith error? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello . I withdraw my request because i do not plan to be very active on WP. I warned them because they seemed to be the same IP who made the same change a few hours before and got reverted and they didn't make any response to my edit summary AlexBobCharles (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn for bot. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello @MSouvik01. You don't seem to warn people consistently after reverting them. It's easy to do with WP:Twinkle. Could you commit to doing this? I also noticed that you rarely leave WP:edit summaries. It's good practice to let others know what your edit did! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 09:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

I have been patrolling recent changes for a while now and understand the policies on vandalism and copyright. Aydoh8[contribs] 01:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done, for the same reason as OP's request for rollback -Fastily 02:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I have been patrolling RC for a while now and would like the rollback permission so that I am able to use tools such as Huggle. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 07:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
I do for ~99% of my reverts, those three I might have forgotten. Aydoh8[contribs] 14:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 22:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Will do :) Aydoh8[contribs] 23:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for confirming,  Done -Fastily 02:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

I have made several changes to articles and think rollback rights would be convenient for me. Daniel Plumber (talk) 06:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You have very little or no experience reverting vandalism. Please reapply if that is an area of editing that you take up in the future. Malinaccier (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]

    You can help Wikipedia!

    [edit]
    Add a reference to an unreferenced BLP

    Special:NewPagesFeed

    1. Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses § Edit summary disagreement about describing the status of Jehovah's Witnesses in Norway 03:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
    2. Talk:Smosh § Channels and Content section dispute regarding the inclusion of a video content section in article. 21:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

    update, Purge

    Discussions

    [edit]
    August 24, 2024
    August 23, 2024
    August 22, 2024
    August 21, 2024
    August 20, 2024
    August 19, 2024
    August 18, 2024
    August 17, 2024
    Elapsed listings
    Backlog

    Editorial noticeboards

    [edit]
    BLP noticeboard (27 threads)
    Fringe theories noticeboard (17 threads)
    Original research noticeboard (12 threads)
    Reliable sources noticeboard (25 threads)
    Neutral point of view noticeboard (28 threads)
    External links noticeboard (4 threads)
    Conflict of interest noticeboard (21 threads)
    Dispute resolution noticeboard (3 threads)

    Noticeboards

    [edit]

    Policies and Guidelines

    [edit]

    edit .