User:Kzw53/Choose an Article
Appearance
Article Selection
[edit]Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Is it written neutrally?
- Does each claim have a citation?
- Are the citations reliable?
- Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
- Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
Option 1
[edit]- Computer-aided ergonomics
- Article Evaluation
- This topic relates to the content of course because it is all about human interaction with computers. We’re looking at the article it’s clear to see that there are somethings written about it, but it does not go into detail or have any work cited for it. Each claim does not have a citation, and it looks like there are some gaps but none that have to do with the quality. When looking at the talk page, there is almost nothing that is mentioned in it at all.
- Sources
- Computer-aided ergonomics
Option 2
[edit]- CSS framework
- Article Evaluation
- This topic relevant content of the course because it is about computer styling that interacts with humans. That’s how we were able to get different frameworks to work on websites. This article is written neutrally, and it seems to just list out specific facts. There is a list of bibliography ‘s, and there’s a semi active talk page; of the citations listed they seem reliable. The article does not cover one of the Wikipedia equity gaps.
- Sources
- CSS framework
Option 3
[edit]- Article title
- Key signature (cryptography)
- Article Evaluation
- Like mentioned for the other articles, this is relevant to the course because there’s different types of technology that is used to secure our Data. There is not much written about it, and it is written in a neutral tone. The talk page is almost nonexistent, and there are almost no citations; of the citations listed they seem reliable.
- Sources
- Key signature (cryptography)
Option 4
[edit]- Article title
- Cryptosystem
- Article Evaluation
- This is relevant to the course because it has to do with cryptography and hold it again keeps our data safe. In order for humans to interact, they have to ensure that secure. Without a cryptosystem this is almost impossible. We look at the article it does look like it’s written in a neutral voice, but there is very minimal information mentioned. There is a talk page, and some bibliography‘s. With that being said, it seems like a very intriguing article because there are at least people interacting on it and it can be of interest to me for the class.
- Sources
- Cryptosystem
Option 5
[edit]- Article title
- Null encryption
- Article Evaluation
- This article is relevant to the course because it deals with securing data. There is not much written on the page at all but there are references. It is written in a neutral voice, and there is no talk page on it. Each claim does seem to have a citation, and the citations do seem reliable. This does not cover any equity gaps.
- Sources
- Null encryption