User:ZfJames/sandbox/templates
page name! Edits Reverted (August 2024)
[edit]
{{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
User:ZfJames 08 2024
[edit]
Hullo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent edits to the User:ZfJames page since this is a test of my template. BLAH BLAH BLAH! As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thank you for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 15:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
page name! Edits Reverted (August 2024)
[edit]{{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
page name! Edits Reverted (August 2024)
[edit]{{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 19:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- Rkd dalmas01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1011 (LTA 1011, details). Note: Some true positives from this filter will look "innocent". Please see the comment at the top of Special:AbuseFilter/1011. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Declined. No disruption since being warned. Currently at level III. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:582:c67f:ffc0:2848:5c14:6527:c89e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:a61:1222:4d01:e4d0:d10:d16f:405e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2a01:cb00:28:5a00:610f:2e29:2a68:b023 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Civilised gang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Rtlirtirtcas (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – block evasion of Delfinfgea. Frost 06:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2401:D800:441:C406:DD77:4540:DEBC:84D5 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Disruption after final warning. Codename Noreste 🤔 Talk 06:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- On Stake (diff): Persistently adding spam links despite a final warning. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- AKA024 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) crosswiki image Spam (Copyright violation) --WikiBayer (talk) 07:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yamiyami123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Adding link for donghongpipe just like recently blocked WangRichard1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Donghongpipe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in HDPE pipe. See page revision history. I can go to SPI, but this seems too simple for that. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 07:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Newcomer1086 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) personal attack after NPA4 warning - see their talk page - Arjayay (talk) 09:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sukhoiso (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Clearly WP:NOTHERE; non-stop disruptive editing on Tunisia-related articles.[1][2][3][4] Skitash (talk) 11:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- ItsRayen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Disruptive editing and making the exact same edits as Sukhoiso on Tunisia. Likely sock.[5][6][7] Skitash (talk) 11:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- TIARA K K (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – They haven't gone over the warning limit but some of their edit summaries at least need rev/del. Someone has left an edit warring warning as well. Knitsey (talk) 12:11, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2A02:C7C:873B:F900:41E2:AC18:A503:A83F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism from multiple IPs -- see history of Jim Davidson. JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 0 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 0 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 10 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Yoloswaglord420 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "yolo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Although this string is not a username violation in and of itself, it may indicate disruptive editing. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Asofficialug (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yolomomo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Joyce borenstein at illuminationanimation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – User is a COI SPA, since 2018 devoted solely to curating her own page and that of her father, i.e. Joyce Borenstein & Sam Borenstein. Previous COIN report in Feb [8], activity continued in May, and presumably will continue. Axad12 (talk) 08:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Question: @331dot: Does it not warrant a block per WP:IMPERSONATE if the Joyce Borenstein article is a BLP about a notable person? Unless there is off-wiki communication that has verified their identity? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- If someone else thinks differently that's fine with me, but my thinking is that the name is so detailed that, unless there is other evidence that it might be someone else operating the account, that a block is not necessary for the name(that leaves aside the COI issues). 331dot (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with 331dot. This is a COI issue, not a username issue. Cullen328 (talk) 17:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thirded. COI. Secretlondon (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Coldroombjt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spamming for bjt.co.id at user page, along with sock account User:Jasapendingin. Also keeping an eye on Coldroombjtberkualitas and Gudangpendnginberkualitas, but no spam from those accounts yet. Wikishovel (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP unconstructive edits. DareshMohan (talk) 06:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Important bio aricle. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 08:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip adress vandalising the articles. Monhiroe (talk) 08:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Heavy unsourced additions by IPs. Semi for one week recommended. Thewikizoomer (talk) 03:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: User appearing to be adding language other than english despite warnings by other user. Thewikizoomer (talk) 12:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Protection required to prevent repeated addition of a non RS, non BLP compliant attack page. Axad12 (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Consistent vandalism from IPs and new users due to the online "Ironland" movement. RyanAl6 (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jdcomix (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: ip user persistently attempting to make a change without discussing. i believe protection might lead them to the talk page. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- for the record, i don't know of any interval. the edits seem to be sporadic (could be a day, could be a month), so i won't make any suggestions for time cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Some1 (talk) 22:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs or SPA, attempting to promote a non-notable Youtuber called Koifish. ⁂CountHacker (talk) 23:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 00:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continuous IP and user vandalism of removing content - the page being viewed by many users recently due to a current event. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 01:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP hopper can't stop themselves. Nswix (talk) 02:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Indefinite semi protection requested considering the edit history scenario. Thewikizoomer (talk) 03:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After a COI editor wasn't permitted to add promotion to this article, they've written a blog post that is sending their users to Wikipedia. Please semiprotect to give this some time to blow over. MrOllie (talk) 03:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page has more than 1000 views per day on average. Some IP and non-confirmed users keep changing the images without valid reason. It needs high level of protection so that only autoconfirmed users can edit the page (similar to Head of state page which have pending changes protection) JoshuaJ28 (talk) 04:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing / Unsourced content in the last few days. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IP addresses involving the name Wheatley2 (talk) 06:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding personal information and posting objectionable content. Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Look - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Komal_Jha&oldid=1240755331 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Komal_Jha&oldid=1240755276 Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of logo images for multiple Paramount TV channels in Australia by IP users, including on the articles for 10 Bold Drama, 10 Peach Comedy and Nickelodeon. Yours sincerely, Bas (or TechGeek105) (talk to me) 07:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Will120 (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, both with IPs and socks, nearly 2 dozen edits/reverts over 6 days. Alivardi (talk) 09:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP Address and @Xizx12 vandalized the disambiguation page, and other edits are irrelevant in disambiguation page. Royiswariii (talk) 10:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandal who keeps changing IPs and vandalising the page every few days for months now. Many of their previous IPs have been blocked but they keep changing IPs. Bennv123 (talk) 11:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by Shurbanm (talk · contribs). I applied for intervention against vandalism, nothing. Beshogur (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced date information, from newly created accounts this month of August 2024. Hotwiki (talk) 12:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting page protection for all calendar years (except the 20th century) for persistent disruptive edits by multiple IPs that begin with "User:2600". Example, adding entries incorrectly here for the year 1869 and for 1455. Unsourced entries for 1848 despite warnings. These are just examples, the IPs have edited more pages based on their edit histories.Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 12:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. PadFoot (talk) 12:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Serious BLP vandalism from multiple IPs. JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:34, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
In the note "c" which is added on the platform section on iOS, Android and macOS add this text: "On 16th August 2024 the Epic Games Store for iOS released in the European Union, making it possible to reinstall the game on iOS and iPadOS devices. Noobody20061591 (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Noobody20061591: Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Reliable sources are a requirement for adding the information. Noobody20061591, you are only three edits away from auto-confirmed status. Once you have attained that, you can make an edit request on the article talk page. Still needs sources, though. Favonian (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 8 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 09:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC) |
| 28 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Losipov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jordanroderick (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Noorullah21 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Would like to cut down on the backlog of pages that need to be reviewed while I create pages, especially as of recent where I've been working on creating pages for military battles, and Bahmani rulers. I definitely believe the pages I've created shows I am familiar with the guidelines of page notability, and especially quality. I've practiced with this being a new page patroller myself. Noorullah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- GreatStellatedDodecahedron (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 25 new pages and would like to request the autopatrolled right. I have been a user since 2007, but have increased my writing on Wikipedia in the last 3 years. I create articles in generally non-controversial areas such as crystallography, symmetry and philately. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- ToadetteEdit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi again, Toadette. You were great during the 2024 CrowdStrike-related article title saga! I hope you become a Page Mover at the same time as me! Jruderman (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Given User talk:ToadetteEdit#Move review for Donald Trump fist pump photographs just today, as well as a past history of similar closes of deletion discussions at DRV, I am not convinced this should be granted. * Pppery * it has begun... 06:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm also concerned about User_talk:ToadetteEdit#RM_at_Talk:Ted_Wilson_(figure_skater), which is, at best, a communication failure (
A good closer will transparently explain how the decision was reached
– WP:NHC), and at worst a headcount to determine consensus (WP:NOTDEMOCRACY). DatGuyTalkContribs 13:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm an active AfC reviewer, and I spend a lot of time patrolling new pages. I often draftify articles that are not sourced or need additional sources (over 250 articles so far). Having this right would be super useful and help reduce the number of R2 tags for admins in the backlog. I also have experience in WP:RM, and I'd like to request page mover rights for non-controversial tasks. Thank you, Waqar💬 16:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- AlexBobCharles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Adriazeri (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’ve been editing for a little while now, I’ve requested page protection and reverted edits which are not appropriate on various pages. I am pretty devoted to editing on Wikipedia and I have an extensive Watchlist so I think this permission would be useful. Adriazeri (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- MSouvik01 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been monitoring the pages in Wikipedia for a long time. I try my best to review new changes, revert any vandalism and provide authenticity. This permission will help me review the pages more fluently. MSouvik01 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- TheNuggeteer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Did all the requirements and patrolled the recent changes page for a rotating number of days. My account also meets all the requirements. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- TheFrenchKing (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been creating and monitoring articles in Wikipedia for a long time and its time to a new step in this great community. TheFrenchKing (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Jiffles1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been patrolling recent changes and combating vandalism for a little over a month. I've been primarily using Twinkle and I would like to request rollback privileges to use other tools such as Huggle. I understand the importance of leaving users a notice whenever their edits are reverted. Jiffles1 (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there! Thanks for responding. I believe I left warning messages for the three reverts you cited (here, here, and here). In all three cases, I used Twinkle to generate the messages because, as you noted, the tool makes the process extremely easy. Admittedly, I was bit inconsistent in leaving warnings when I first started combating vandalism, but I have been quite diligent about it over the past couple of weeks. If I’m missing something or doing something wrong, please let me know and I’ll correct it going forward. Jiffles1 (talk) 11:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies, you are totally correct. I misread the edit summaries for those reverts. Appreciate the clarification,
Done -Fastily 09:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies, you are totally correct. I misread the edit summaries for those reverts. Appreciate the clarification,
- Hi there! Thanks for responding. I believe I left warning messages for the three reverts you cited (here, here, and here). In all three cases, I used Twinkle to generate the messages because, as you noted, the tool makes the process extremely easy. Admittedly, I was bit inconsistent in leaving warnings when I first started combating vandalism, but I have been quite diligent about it over the past couple of weeks. If I’m missing something or doing something wrong, please let me know and I’ll correct it going forward. Jiffles1 (talk) 11:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- NaomiAmethyst (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I had this as admin, I would still find it useful. — Naomi Amethyst 03:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- ItsCheck (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have used Twinkle to revert vandalism mostly from the recent changes page for a while now and warn users afterwards. Twinkle is not sufficient for me on longer articles because of my sluggish internet connection. Reverts I make with Twinkle may take up to ten seconds, even with ethernet connected to my router. Rollback permissions would be greatly appreciated to make edits faster and save time. I can be trusted with rollback permissions as I have been actively reverting vandalism with a few breaks for school since July 2023, consistantly warning editors with the templates that Twinkle offers. I understand what is and what is not vandalism, and believe that I have what it takes to be trusted with the rollback tool. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done you've barely made any reverts since I declined your previous request. I've told you this before: please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. -Fastily 09:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Evelyn Harthbrooke (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am a long time editor of Wikipedia (having been on Wikipedia since May 2011, over 13 years), and have made over 7,530 edits with over 570 of them being template edits (8.2% of my total edits); I personally feel I am responsible when it comes to templates (having not vandalized any templates and even created several, such as iOS version table), and I have discovered numerous instances where I wanted to edit a template to fix or add something, but couldn't, because of the lack of the necessary permission, so I have been restricted to only being able to edit non-template editor protected templates, which while quite abundant, restricts me from being able to directly improve or edit templates protected under that permission. If granted the permission, I will thoroughly test any module or template I edit that is protected by this permission if a given change I make is either big in scope or needs testing. I also fully understand my capabilities and limits when it comes to module editing, and will not make any changes that could break a high-traffic template or module. I also meet all necessary guidelines aside from 3 sandboxes/5 requests, but hopefully this won't impact my request for the permission, as I understand a permission like this is a big responsibility, one I am willing to accept. As the saying goes, with great power comes great responsibility, and I am very much willing and able to be responsible with this permission if I am granted it. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 23:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: 13)
(guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
- Primefac (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Disinclined to grant, mainly from lack of proven ability (i.e. that "3 sandboxes/5 requests" issue); not being able to edit a template does not mean someone is prevented from improving the template, just that they cannot edit the template directly (which is why sandboxes exist). Personally I would prefer to see evidence of thorough testing of proposed edits before the perm is granted, but will leave this open for now for other opinions from my colleagues. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Primefac Respectfully, I kindly disagree with your stance on this. Those last two guidelines aren’t stated as hard requirements, they’re stated as being soft guidelines. Someone was granted the permission without meeting those guidelines; I saw the last few permission granting applications. And with regard to what I said regarding not being able to edit the templates, editing a template directly is exactly what I meant. I have hundreds of edits in the template namespace, not meeting the 3/5 soft guideline shouldn’t disqualify me from being able to be granted the permission. However, I did actually modify a module sandbox yesterday night. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 12:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Meeting the numerical minimum gets you in the door, otherwise it would be declined out-of-hand. The "soft" requirements are what we look at for granting. The fact that there is leeway in how we interpret those guidelines is exactly why I'm not declining this request outright. I will note, though, that of the last half-dozen applicants, all but one had a previous trial period or previously had the full permission. Primefac (talk) 12:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Primefac Respectfully, I kindly disagree with your stance on this. Those last two guidelines aren’t stated as hard requirements, they’re stated as being soft guidelines. Someone was granted the permission without meeting those guidelines; I saw the last few permission granting applications. And with regard to what I said regarding not being able to edit the templates, editing a template directly is exactly what I meant. I have hundreds of edits in the template namespace, not meeting the 3/5 soft guideline shouldn’t disqualify me from being able to be granted the permission. However, I did actually modify a module sandbox yesterday night. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 12:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Disinclined to grant, mainly from lack of proven ability (i.e. that "3 sandboxes/5 requests" issue); not being able to edit a template does not mean someone is prevented from improving the template, just that they cannot edit the template directly (which is why sandboxes exist). Personally I would prefer to see evidence of thorough testing of proposed edits before the perm is granted, but will leave this open for now for other opinions from my colleagues. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
end ----------------------------------