Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (190.80.12.168) is used to identify you instead.
I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! –Gladamastalk 23:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Epistle to the Romans have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Education in Guyana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 22:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of trade unions— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flooded with them hundreds 16:49, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Pbroks13. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Whitney Smith have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Pbroks13 (talk) 23:25, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hurricane Luis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Tolly4bolly 02:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Luis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 03:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David A. Granger, you may be blocked from editing. {{ping|waddie96}} {talk} 10:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Irfaan Ali, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm SunilNevlaFan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:February have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SunilNevlaFan✨ 14:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Cotyledon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Plantsurfer 13:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Grupo Argos—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
