Hello, I'm Theinstantmatrix. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eagle Vale, New South Wales without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to St Andrews, New South Wales, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Danski454 (talk) 11:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Claymore, New South Wales, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Southern Cross Television. Shellwood (talk) 08:14, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cartwright, New South Wales, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! FigfiresSend me a message! 01:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Ktrimi991. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Ktrimi991 (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Australians imprisoned or executed abroad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geartooth Friendship is Magic! 05:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sara Bareilles, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 09:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Southern Cross News, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:30, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Russell Crowe. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 02:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.
If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (101.164.10.34) is used to identify you instead.
I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! Newyorkadam (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Youngblood (5 Seconds of Summer song), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 94rain Talk 01:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Dusti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Josh Frydenberg— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Peter Dutton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
