[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

User talk:2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Politically Correct Party Animals (April 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Gloria DeHaven has been reverted.
Your edit here to Gloria DeHaven was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/Gloria-Lynne-Gloria-DeHaven-Tina-Robins-Gloria-Lynne-And-Her-Friends/master/1103297) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to The Main Ingredient (band) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Many of your other edits lack edit-summaries. Please provide them, or your edits may look like and be reverted as vandalism for being unexplained changes. --David Tornheim (talk) 09:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube videos as references

[edit]

Please do not add YouTube videos as references for themselves or in other inappropriate ways as you did here. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#YouTube_references_(and_others_like_it)_used_improperly. --David Tornheim (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to All the King's Men (2006 film) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:17, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Films

[edit]

Hi. Please see WP:FILMDIST - we only add the distribution company to the infobox for the country the film was made in, not other places. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Sausage Party. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Shellwood (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Casablanca (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. While you did provide sourcing for most of the information you added, you did not cite the last statement claiming that an uncensored version had been released in Ireland. Perhaps you intended to add a reference later? If that's the case, please don't add information with the intention to add a source; add the source at the same time. DonIago (talk) 20:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think many of my edits here in the two days I have been unblocked from editing have been constructive. I feel sorry for NinjaRobotPirate, I must say. Someone has hacked his account and made it overstep his capabilities as an administrator by reverting even the most constructive of my edits by constantly saying "block evasion." The hacker should face the consequences for this, and I should be unblocked. 2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB (talk) 07:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is more than enough disruptive editing to justify this block, even without any consideration of block evasion. In fact it seems that one person has been editing disruptively from this IP range for such a long time that the one thing about this block that might justifiably be reconsidered is that it is for so short a period. And no, making absurd claims about the blocking administrator does nothing to increase your likelihood of being unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize sincerely for any edits that made by this IP address that have been perceived as "disruptive" over the years. They weren't intended to be disruptive, yet, somehow, they came across as such. 2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB (talk) 10:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's nothing remotely sincere in this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to state for the record that it was never my intention to make any edit to any article that might be construed as disruptive. I see now that some of my edits over the years have fallen into that category. During the course of my time editing Wikipedia articles, I had tried to put in information I felt was useful, vital and informative into my articles. Most of the time, these tries have been successful, and the contents of these are still present in about half of the articles I have edited. Others, like my edits to articles on The Grudge, Resident Evil: Apocalypse and certain films that were banned in Ireland and other countries, fell flat on their faces, and for very obvious reasons. If not, how come they were all reverted? I express some guilt over an edit war with Andrzejbanas that took place yesterday regarding the first two pages that I mentioned. It was my fault that it happened in the first place. I tried to put in valuable sources and failed to realize that there were policies in place on the website prohibiting the use of them as such. I swear that if ever I repeat the edit wars, I will try my darndest to resolve them right away. I beg all of the administrators of this website for their forgiveness. 2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are checkuser blocked for socking. There is no possible appeal you could make via this IP range that will result in an unblock. Given the significant disruption caused via your accounts/IPs, the only possible route to an unblock would be a standard offer via an ArbCom appeal. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2019

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Only the Strong Survive (song). Binksternet (talk) 21:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Politically Correct Party Animals concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Politically Correct Party Animals, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Politically Correct Party Animals

[edit]

Hello, 2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Politically Correct Party Animals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 23:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2600:8800:FF10:1200:B493:CDED:5E6:6EFB&oldid=1073330569"