[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:MartinUK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, MartinUK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  D. J. Bracey (talk) 21:51, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for John Cleland (racing driver)

[edit]

Hello, good work on John Cleland (racing driver), and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in John Cleland (racing driver)? You can simply add links, preferably as the inline citations, or see citation templates for different citation methods. Thanks! best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 03:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

[edit]

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 1% for major edits and 3% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 74 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 21:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines for Wikipedia lists of ethnic groups

[edit]

Please may I draw your attention to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Guidelines_for_Wikipedia_lists_of_ethnic_groups

Your contributions would be very welcome. -- Brownlee 11:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your contributions to the List of British Jews, and hope that you will continue to contribute to it and to the talk page. - Newport 10:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Laverty

[edit]

Hey there. If you are currently working on this article and don't want people to edit it while you improve it, it's a good idea to use the {{inuse}} tag. Have fun! (|-- UlTiMuS ( U | T | C [] M | E ) 18:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject British Motorsport - Collaboration of the month

[edit]

The British Motorsport Wikiproject which you are a listed as a member of has started a collaboration of the month. You can nominate and vote for articles related to Motorsport in the UK with a view to working to improve one article each month to Good Article status. Please take a moment to have a look at the project page here. Thanks! Alexj2002 13:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources

[edit]
  1. Your change to the page Neil Patrick Harris [1] was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article David Burtka, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It is especially important that you not contribute unsourced statements to the biographies of living people, please see our policy at WP:BLP for details. If you need any help attributing sources, please feel free to contact me. Thanks, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Radisich

[edit]

Yes, Paul Radisich in Croatian would be spelt Radisić. The letter ć in Croatian sounds like ch...hence people add the h to get people to say it correct. Otherwise people would say RadisiCK. Adding the h is common all over the world by Croatian Immigrants but in saying that almost 60% don't add the h.

It was also popular for names to be Anglosized, Italianized ..something like Ivankovich became Evans etc...Pilic became Polo etc... The most popular non Croat sounding last name is Abbott. Dates back to gold rush days.

Jagoda 1 03:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC) Jagoda 1 03:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy warning

[edit]

As author of the below article you should be made aware:

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Snooker (rule), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Snooker (rule). If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kris 14:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign posts

[edit]

Please remember to sign your talk page posts and indent responses, or talk pages become hard to follow. :-) — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 21:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

[edit]

I and I'm sure many others appreciate the amount of sourcing of obscure facts that you do, but to be honest you are effectively also creating a lot of unnecessary work for other editors by not doing it properly. Please use:

  • <ref name="SomethingUniqueHere">{{Cite web|url=http://whatever.com/page|other details here...}}</ref>

instead of:

  • [http://whatever.com/page]

It would be immensely helpful. (The two blue links in the code example there will take you to the documentation for ref and for cite web (there are also {{cite book}}, etc.) — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 17:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please source articles properly, not by dumping bare URLs into the text of the article. This simply makes more and more cleanup work for other people to do. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 22:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch!

[edit]
A Barnstar Point
Awarded for: Catching a subtle Masters Snooker error at Andy Hicks, due to my misreading an ambiguously phrased source. SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 17:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That error could have stayed in there literally for years! — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 17:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joss Stone

[edit]

I'm removing the Jewish singer and such categories from Joss Stone. I'm probably going to need some support showing how hysteric people become when you remove that stuff, so I'm asking for your help. The source http://www.liberaljudaism.org/education_anglo_jewry.htm seems to take additions from just about anyone and also thinks wikipedia is a good resource. Who knows where they got this stuff. Thanks.

Re: "why was this explanation deleted in the first place?)" – No idea; I hadn't even noticed. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 11:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sen. Jesse Helms

[edit]

Thanks for trying to fix the Moseley-Braun / Allen bit in the "controversies" section, but your fixed version is also incorrect. Claude Allen had moved on long before she became a senator. Also, "Dixie" is not a "song about the good life during slavery." There is nothing in the song about slavery. (Note: I'm talking about the original version, not Tom Lehrer's parody.) NCdave (talk) 20:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Helms: examples of Bigotry

[edit]

1.Helms opposed the Martin Luther King holiday bill in 1983

2.After a protest during his 1986 visit to Mexico, Sen. Helms was quoted: "All Latins are volatile people": end quote


and lastly, i write in disgust!

3.As an aide to the 1950 Senate campaign of North Carolina Republican candidate Willis Smith, Sen. Helms helped create attack ads against Smith's opponent Frank Graham, including one which read: "White people, wake up before it is too late. Do you want Negroes working beside you, your wife and your daughters, in your mills and factories? Frank Graham favors mingling of the races." :end quote


MartinUK,

Those three "examples" alone warrant the label of a Bigot.


Alvin A. Harris

Jesse Helms examples of bigotry pt.2

[edit]

1.In columns, commentaries and pronouncements from the Senate floor, Helms sowed hatred and called names: The University of North Carolina was "the University of Negroes and Communists." (Capital Times, 11/22/94) Black civil rights activists were "Communists and sex perverts." (Copley News Service, 8/23/01)


2.Of civil rights protests Helms wrote, "The Negro cannot count forever on the kind of restraint that's thus far left him free to clog the streets, disrupt traffic, and interfere with other men's rights." (WRAL-TV commentary, 1963)


3.He also wrote, "Crime rates and irresponsibility among Negroes are a fact of life which must be faced." (New York Times, 2/8/81)


4.when a caller to CNN's Larry King Live show praised guest Jesse Helms for "everything you've done to help keep down the niggers," Helms' response was to salute the camera and say, "Well, thank you, I think." (Wilmington Star-News, 9/16/95)


MartinUK,

Would you like more examples? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.232.153.118 (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


MartinUK, just so you know, Alvin (a/k/a 144.232.153.118 or GRANDEXTRAV) is citing "facts" that are really just unproven anecdotes, spread by Sen. Helms' political enemies. If there were provable examples of bigotry on his part, then Jim Hunt and Harvey Gantt would surely have used them against him during their multi-million dollar campaigns to capture his Senate seat. They didn't because they could find no such examples.
"Columns, commentaries and pronouncements from the Senate floor" are all very public forms of expression, which in most cases create lasting paper trails. So if Helms had actually "sowed hatred and called names" by calling UNC "the University of Negroes and Communists" in such forums, as Alvin evidently believes, there should be records to prove it. But there aren't. If there were, then Helms' opponents would have used them against him, during their Senate campaigns.
Unfortunately, Alvin seems to accept as fact any accusation against Helms that he reads, without bothering to see even whether it is plausible. Consider, for example, this "fact" that Alvin cites: "As an aide to the 1950 Senate campaign of North Carolina Republican candidate Willis Smith... Helms..." It is obviously nonsense, in part because in 1950 Jesse Helms was a 28 year old Democrat. NCdave (talk) 09:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MartinUK, i've noticed you do a lot of work on snooker articles, just wondering if you wanted to put your name down on WikiProject Snooker. Not that it makes much difference! Samasnookerfan (talk) 19:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

[edit]

Please do not make person attacks in your edit summaries as you did in your edit to Jaime Camara. Doing so is expressly prohibited by Wikipedia policy. Also, please do not remove cited material without a good reason (which you did not provide, other than calling another editor a "moron". -Drdisque (talk) 13:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:UEFA Euro 2008

[edit]

Just to inform you the remarks about the penalty shoot-out weren't a mistake: [2] - article 7.08, page 9. DrFishcake (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Worldwide TV coverage blackout UEFA EURO 2008

[edit]

Apparently, its easier to deal with a technical fault if all the cables are in the same place... and it was a stroke of luck that the BBC had the five live operating remotely - unconfirmed but i think that the bbc viewers were lucky as we at least had half the experience

92.236.146.87 (talk) 21:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think what we pay for radio is about 1/15th of the license fee, but I guess it's about 1/4 of the experience. Was 5Live's team elsewhere in the stadium, but with a totally different set of cables?

A tag has been placed on Simon Andrews (motorcycle racer), British motorcycle racer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 17:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't call motorcycle racing an amateur sport - although many competitors pay for the rides themselves or through personal sponsors, most of the top guys are paid (fairly big money in some cases) by teams linked to motorcycle manufacturers.--MartinUK (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the alternative in WP:BIO#Athletes is "fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing" - I guess the lines aren't so clear in motorcycle racing, Whatever, he makes it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

F1 race reports

[edit]

Hi MartinUK. Thanks for the great work you are doing converting the information in the "Notes" sections of F1 race reports into proper paragraphs. One little tip for you: an easy way to ensure the race classification table appears below the infobox and race report, rather than inserting a whole bunch of carriage returns, is to insert a "clear" code "{{-}}" above the table - see this example. Also, if the fastest lap information is included in the infobox, feel free to remove it from the "Notes" section. But apart from that: keep up the good work! Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 02:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Comfort zone"

[edit]

The onus is on those addingn information to provide references - I added the fact tag to alert you to this, rather than simply deleting the unsourced statement. Please assume good faith. (I also added the sub heading with a view to offering a place to put normal political policies into, should yourself or another wish).--Red Deathy (talk) 10:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama's ancestry

[edit]

I just wanted to give you a heads-up that the specifics of Obama's ancestry is already in the body of the article. In fact, it's in the very next section after the intro, so it's kind of redundant to put it in the intro as well. --GoodDamon 22:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having only African American in the lead sentence is not neutral in any shape or form, it is an extreme bias. Reliable sources can be found in great number for both bi-racial and African American. WP:NPOV is a core policy and prohibits this type of POV placement in articles. Landon1980 (talk) 02:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd agree with Landon here, especially due to the specifics of Obama's life (his father's limited involvement, his Indonesian stepfather, his deliberate adoption of a black identity in his 20s after struggling with his identity to the point of attributing his past cocaine use to it). The Lewis Hamilton article reached a consensus in which a single sentance mentions both 'first African-American president' and 'white mother/black father'.--MartinUK (talk) 02:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because calling an individual the same thing he calls himself is such a disgusting POV ... right. Grsz11 →Review! 02:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The point of view of the subject of an article is still a point of view. We don't allow people to edit their own articles, so why should their opinions of themselves take precedence?--MartinUK (talk) 02:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then we use what reliable sources say...African American. Grsz11 →Review! 02:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So why not use the many sources which expand on this? Calling him 'African American' is like calling a tuna mayonnaise sandwich a bread product, it's only half the story.--MartinUK (talk) 02:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And it is in the very next section, where it is better served to go into that depth. Grsz11 →Review! 02:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'White mother' is not 'depth'. The list of his pre-president policies in the intro is much longer and contains less crucial info--MartinUK (talk) 02:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
None of the suggested terms are indepth at all. Why all of you keep talking about what Obama refers to himself as is beyond me. BLP mentions no such thing as adhering to what the person wants. You wouldn't call a tuna sandwich tuna in the very first sentence, then go on in the body to explain it is between two slices of bread. What is so hard to understand about a simple fact of NPOV? Reliable sources describe him as both, and picking one of them is POV and it is really that simple. This will lead to an RFC, the editor above is proof that all most editors are concerned about is what they think Obama would want. Landon1980 (talk) 04:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By all means, open an RfC instead of dragging on discussions that are way past consensus. Grsz11 →Review! 04:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And don't put words in my mouth, as you've grown accustom to doing. I never said "what Obama would want". Grsz11 →Review! 04:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You repeatedly bring up that he "self identifies as African American" you list that as one of your reasons why the lead should be as is. Why do you do and say things if you will not admit to doing them? Even if not word for word you have more than implied it. Landon1980 (talk) 04:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

new article

[edit]

Keep improving this article, Joan Lascorz! References and notability. Good luck Chergles (talk) 20:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

Don't blank other editor comments as you did here [3]. It seems to be fixed and therefore no harm was done but keep it in mind and rather check twice before saving your posts. Thanks, --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 02:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I might have jumped ahead as I realize now that my initial confusing came from an edit conflict. Please dismiss my comment I just placed on your talk page. Actually, just blank the whole new section if you wish unless you'd like to keep my apology standing what would be fine with me (of course).--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 02:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Fathers

[edit]

Although these people are not Jewish, noting that the fathers are Jewish is a reasonable compromise. I have removed others in the past (Ryan Braun, the baseball player), but will leave this.Sposer (talk) 23:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note question

[edit]

Note that there's a question for you at Talk:List of people with chronic fatigue syndrome#Notable people?. Thanks, WLU (t) (c) (rules - simple rules) 12:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also note - your userbox display on your user page is a bit messy, I wonder if this would be helpful? WLU (t) (c) (rules - simple rules) 13:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find this edit summary quite insulting, considering I've been working on it this week and have expanded some of it. I've tagged it with {{underconstruction}} so that sarcastic edit summaries are not made. D.M.N. (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

I've noticed you've been adding references to the snooker articles as external links. You may find this page of some help in correctly formatting your references: Wikipedia:Cheatsheet Betty Logan (talk) 13:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Doherty

[edit]

Please read this before re-adding poorly referenced material: Wikipedia:Referencing_for_beginners Betty Logan (talk) 20:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to link the references asked by Betty, but I am a new editor and find the technical side of her request difficult to perform. I have made progress but it is still not 100% perhaaps you can assist. She is technically right but I wish she would assist rather than reverting us. Tommyxx (talk) 12:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am willing to give assistance when it is asked for, so I wish you would ask for assistance instead of just reverting. MartinUK is not a new user and refuses to adopt correct referencing despite several warnings in the past. He has been a nuisance on the snooker project for a while now. I don't have any axe to grind with you Tommy, but the tragedy here is that if Martin was remotely interested in helping you he would have correctly formatted your reference instead of entering an edit war. Betty Logan (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Ken Doherty. The content has been removed. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Betty Logan (talkcontribs) 12:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Jordan 3rd in the championship?????????????

[edit]

Doh! I can tell you that I copied the table from Giovanardi's page and I obviously forgot to change the position. Cheers for spotting it. Petera93 (talk) 09:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Caroline Flint. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Ponting

[edit]

Thanks for your edits, but where in the article does its say Ponting is Hilfenhaus' cousin? I've seen that wrote before but I don't think it's correct. Also in the article it says Hilfy plays for "Tasmania University Cricket Club" which is not true, infact its Tasmanian Tigers. I think the article is slightly unreliable and can't see where it refers to Ponting as Hilfy's counsin. Thanks, Aaroncrick (talk) 22:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'giving Ponting (his second cousin, believe it or not) a reliable option' six paragraphs from the end. A second cousin is the son of a cousin, by the way. Good spot on the Tansmania Club though.

France national football team‎

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Camw (talk) 23:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thierry Henry, you will be blocked from editing. Don't take the piss, please. Rodhullandemu 23:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to France national football team. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, following your recent edit comments, the sentence still does not read correctly. It was an almost direct steal from the referenced source, and I do see the overall sentiment... but. Care to look at an alternative wording ?

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 01:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Darelle Wilson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable racing driver

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 22:56, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello MartinUK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 389 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Shane Byrne (motorcycle racer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Troy Bayliss - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Robert Milkins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Mo Nunn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Steve Soper - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Michael Judge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Karl Harris - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Jaroslav Janiš - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Randy de Puniet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. John Mayhew (games) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Danny Shittu

[edit]

I am guessing that the game you referred to was in October 2001 if you want to have a go at finding it. 86.43.110.186 (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Power Snooker

[edit]

Hi MartinUK. A new stub, Power Snooker , has been added. It has ben suggested that this stub be merged to main article Snooker. Editors are invited to go to Talk:Power Snooker and leave their views in the debate.Kudpung (talk) 03:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Crab, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Aziz Binladin

[edit]

Just in case you weren't already aware, Abdul Aziz Binladin is a relation of Osama and there are several spellings because the official spelling is in Arabic and as such is translated phonetically. Readro (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry.--MartinUK (talk) 18:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Brock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eggs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hopkins (motorcycle racer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Trott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lords. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a courtesy message. I have opened a discussion at Talk:John Hopkins (motorcycle racer)#Birth place, nationality, Original Research and lede citation regarding the pre-existing prose from 2005 and your addition of a citation in late 2014. This is not a criticism of your actions as I realise your addition was in Good Faith, but the citation does not support some of the content. Thanks.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 21:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, MartinUK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MartinUK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MartinUK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Longest Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madam Secretary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

[edit]

Hello MartinUK! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 17:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]