[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Number 57

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome Click here to leave a new message.

Infobox legislative election inside an Infobox election[edit]

Sorry for the accidental revert at {{South African elections}}.

Unrelated to that, I have a question about this issue that I noticed. 1990 Serbian general election is the example article. This article has two modules inside Infobox election. The turnout in the first module is centred (as it is supposed to), however, by default the turnout in the second module is not centred? Take a look for yourself. Instead of adding {{center}} around it, is it possible to fix this issue in the code? This can also be noticed in the HTML code as style:text-align:center is missing for this turnout. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 18:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I think this is in the style (css?), rather than the template code. It also only seems to be an issue when the template is embedded (it is centred as expected in 2022 Israeli legislative election for example)... I don't really understand much about how style things work – perhaps Jdlrobson could advise? Number 57 20:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to edit party modules?[edit]

Hi there, I saw your edit on the Next Japanese general election about making edits to party display names in the modules instead of directly in the infobox.

Could you remind me how to find and edit the modules? I used to know how to do this but forgot. I recall that the modules are buried pretty deep and not super intuitive to find. Thanks. Basil the Bat Lord (talk) 07:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basil the Bat Lord: They are at (e.g.) Module:Political party/A. Cheers, Number 57 15:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Basil the Bat Lord (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

French elections - 1932 to 1962[edit]

Could you revert and re-add info from these pages when they were reverted? ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 12:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I may get to it at some point, but it's increasingly tiresome having to restore correct/sourced information when it just gets blindly reverted again and again. Number 57 15:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're telling me. I've had to revert Impru's edit for the 2024 SK election, as he said there was no consensus for using TILE. So I reverted his revert, stating that the conversation is in the first archive of said page's talk page. I'm in the same boat as you. If you're going to revert an edit on a page, make sure that it you aren't doing so blindly, as doing so could have consequences, and can restore edits that could be construed as misinformation. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]