User talk:Noice Catto

Welcome!

Hello, Noice Catto, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Former Presidents of Yemen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Former Presidents of Yemen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Former Presidents of Yemen, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your recent editing history at Naseem Hamed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – ².O.^Boxing 14:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reverted by multiple editors at Naseem Hamed. If you continue your edit war I'll report you. – ².O.^Boxing 12:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Squared.Circle.Boxing Dear editor, please allow me to add the yemeni nationality to the wiki because we don't have alot of boxing champions like you and we want to have something to be proud of.

thank you for your understanding Noice Catto (talk) 13:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two editors have reverted you. You should attempt to establish a consensus for your edit at Talk:Naseem Hamed, as recommended by WP:BRD. – ².O.^Boxing 15:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yemenia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer i messaged yemenia airways and they said it was cancelled Noice Catto (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rashid Mohammad Al-Alaimi

Hello, Noice Catto. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rashid Mohammad Al-Alaimi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Naseem Hamed. Thank you. – ².O.^Boxing 20:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

his Instagram account clearly states that he is yemeni.... Noice Catto (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He's of Yemeni descent. His heritage is not relevant to his notability and doesn't belong in the lead per MOS:ETHNICITY. – ².O.^Boxing 15:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

according to yemeni law you if you have yemeni heritage then that means you are yemeni Noice Catto (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit warring and WP:BLP violations at Naseem Hamed are a continuation of your edit warring from August. You need to either attempt to gain consensus for your edit at Talk:Naseem Hamed, or leave the article stop. – ².O.^Boxing 20:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Yemen Football Association.png

Thanks for uploading File:Yemen Football Association.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Yemen. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. 25stargeneral (talk) 04:44, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know Al-Aidaroos 11:56, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Stroness. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alfie Best, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Stroness (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Stroness i am sorry, i got confused between him and another person. It would be better if you added a portrait of that person! Al-Aidaroos 10:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hadramaut Cup moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hadramaut Cup. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and Blank submission. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Omar Al-Aidaroos

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Dr. Omar Al-Aidaroos, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax I haven't submitted the draft so why did you delete it? Al-Aidaroos 13:36, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kabsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hi, I reverted your edit on User talk:2601:644:8E80:6170:4452:B572:A06D:44ED it contained a WP:PERSONALATTACK encouraging someone to harm themselves. There's no reason to do that and if that IP user is still vandalizing Wikipedia after warnings and such, you can report them to WP:AIV. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 15:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Skynxnex sorry i was mad because he insulted me and my country Al-Aidaroos ✉ 17:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand being upset about it (and if you notice, I had reverted their last disruptive edit and if I had seen it continue, I would have reported them to WP:AIV) but it's unlikely (but not impossible) that that IP will ever edit again or even see that message. And your message itself is, in theory, grounds for a potential block for you (I am not an admin and not threatening you, but trying to help you). So going forward, I'd suggest mostly ignoring such editors other than reverting clear disruption and reporting them as appropriate to stop future disruption if it's on-going. Skynxnex (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Skynxnex thank you so much for reporting him and thanks for the advice Al-Aidaroos ✉ 17:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Noice Catto. Thank you. Galobtter (talk) 06:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Completely unacceptable

You have been blocked indefinitely for this completely unacceptable remark. Yes I know you haven't been warned about it, but this comment was so far beyond something even remotely unacceptable it's unbelievable. How someone could ever type such a think and think it's an acceptable comment is beyond me, and I know for a fact we do not want people who think that's normal behaviour here on Wikipedia. What's even worse is the edit by the IP was over 6 days ago and was quickly reverted. You had to go digging through the page history to even notice it and see what it was and then decided that a mild piece of childish vandalism (that you went looking for) was enough to offend you enough to seek out the IP's talk page to tell them the only way they can benefit humanity is through self harm. That doesn't speak to anything even remotely assuming good faith or a reasonable set of edits. Canterbury Tail talk 07:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im so sorry i was just infuriated by what he called me and my country, im just a minor and i didn't really think someone would actually get sad from what i said. I might deserve this punishment but at the same time i got a warning from someone already and i have stopped doing that. I hope you accept my apology Al-Aidaroos ✉ 07:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edit that was made to Yemen was the most basic of childish schoolyard name calling vandalism. If you think that's seriously offensive to you and your country enough that you think another person should kill themself over it, then you really shouldn't be here (or on the internet) and clearly lack the competence to edit here.

Now you can request an unblock by following the instructions below and someone else will look at it, but I will not be unblocking you and you have shown no indication that you understand your actions to be wrong. Canterbury Tail talk 07:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the reason i wrote that message was because i've seen alot of hateful edits in the yemen wiki and it happened to be that i exploded at that ip's edit. i hope that the yemen wiki actually gets locked by admins to prevent any of that from happeneing again. Al-Aidaroos ✉ 07:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 07:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noice Catto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to appeal the indefinite block that was placed on my account. I understand that my recent comment on a page was deemed unacceptable, and I deeply regret any offense that I may have caused. However, I believe that the severity of the block is not proportional to the offense.

While I acknowledge that my comment was inappropriate, I would like to provide some context that I believe may have been overlooked. I was not aware that my comment would be so offensive, and I did not intend to cause harm or promote harmful behavior. I understand now that my words were hurtful and I apologize for any pain I may have caused.

I would also like to point out that the edit that prompted my comment was quickly reverted, and I had no intention of continuing any disruptive behavior. I have always respected the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia, and I believe that I can be a productive member of the community.

I am committed to learning from my mistake and being a more positive contributor to Wikipedia. I respectfully request that my block be lifted, and that I be given the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to the community. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Al-Aidaroos✉ 07:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your committment to the community is not in question. Your regret is appreciated, but if you did not know that asking someone to commit suicide would be considered offensive, you lack the skills and knowledge needed to participate here. In some jurisdictions(I don't know about Yemen) there would be legal consequences if you did that and the person actually did kill themselves. I suggest that you not request unblock until you have matured as both a person and editor and can better understand both that actions have consequences, and that words matter. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indefinite Block Appeal Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noice Catto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Admins,

I am writing to appeal my indefinite block on Wikipedia. I understand that my comment was completely unacceptable and I take full responsibility for my actions. I want to assure you and the Wikipedia community that my comment was not reflective of my true character and that I deeply regret the hurtful words that I used.

I acknowledge that my behavior was inappropriate and violated Wikipedia's policies on civility and respectful dialogue. I recognize the importance of maintaining a welcoming and inclusive environment on Wikipedia, and I am committed to upholding these values in the future.

While I understand that my comment was offensive and hurtful, I hope that you can see that it was an isolated incident and not representative of my overall contributions to the site. I have been an active editor on Wikipedia for quite some time now and have made many positive contributions to various pages. I have always strived to be a respectful and productive member of the community, and I hope to continue doing so in the future.

I understand that my actions have consequences, but I am respectfully requesting that you reconsider my block (or just make it a little lenient) and allow me the opportunity to make amends for my mistake. I am willing to participate in any necessary discussions or training to improve my understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely, Al-Aidaroos ✉ 08:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you need ChatGPT to write an unblock request for you, you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 09:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is it just me, or do both these appeals sound exactly like something ChatGPT wrote? 2603:8000:D603:9B02:E5F1:5C8F:BDAE:82E (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

true, i used it so it can help me with grammar and make what i've given it seem more formal Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you can use chatGPT to check whether something was ai generated ot not if you would like to Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

or* Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

false accusations

i DID NOT use chatgpt to WRITE my appeal but used it to REVISE what i wrote Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. We require a level of competence you are unable to display. See WP:CIR. I echo 331dot's comments. You need to go away, leave en.wikipedia alone, for at least a significant number of months. When you have matured and when you have substantially improved your ability to communicate in English, you are free to make a new unblock request. Not before. --Yamla (talk) 09:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla alright how long do you recommend for me to leave? Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The absolute minimum would be six months. I recommend two years, or however long it takes until you have matured significantly and until your understanding of English has improved significantly. So it could be ten years, it could be one year, it's hard to say. --Yamla (talk) 09:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if you were at my position, what would you do? Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd find someplace else to contribute. --Yamla (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

like what? i need to learn somewhere Al-Aidaroos ✉ 09:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care. I won't respond further. --Yamla (talk) 10:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel I am biting the newbies (or I am coming down too hard on you), please just mention it. Al-Aidaroos ✉ 10:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you are blocked from English Wikipedia does not prevent you from contributing to other Wikimedia projects. Consider contributing to Arabic Wikipedia, or Wikisource, or Commons, or whatever. Demonstrate you can contribute positively and can mature; it will take time, likely a couple years at least, but there is an exit ramp. The most important point: do not engage in sockpuppetry/block evasion; doing so will drop the chance of you ever being unblocked to near zero. Curbon7 (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curbon7 Thank you for taking time to clarify this stuff for me 🙏 Al-Aidaroos ✉ 13:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hadramaut Cup

Hello, Noice Catto. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hadramaut Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Hadramaut Cup

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Hadramaut Cup, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]