User talk:Oetkercollection

November 2020

Hello, I'm Kiwi128. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dr. Oetker without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kiwi128 (talk) 09:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 11:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oetkercollection (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No commercial content published

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you may request unblock when you are able to engage with us. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have seen that our Oetker Collection account has been blocked and I was wondering which mistake I made as the last changes I've made was adding a description and new property. Happy to modify the content if something is not accurate or authorized.

Please only place edits in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header/edit summary window. I've fixed this for you. Please click "edit" instead of "new section" at the top of this page to edit this page. This is easier to do with the full desktop version of Wikipedia(even on a phone in a browser). 331dot (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you associated with the Dr. Oetker company? 331dot (talk) 12:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am working in the Communication Department of Oetker Collection.

You should re-read the block notice as well as the policies linked to therein, and make another unblock request that also proposes a new username. 331dot (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]