User talk:OscarRomeoOscarRomeo2019

February 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OscarRomeoOscarRomeo2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fully transparent about status and cited source for update of article for reason for amends. Happy to suggest changes in talk section of wikipedia page for consideration by community

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have not selected a new username as instructed; business names as usernames are not permitted; your username must indicate that an individual is using this account. You need not use your real name. If you want the business name in your username, a name in the format of "Username of SparkEnergy" would be acceptable. Please follow the instructions to propose a compliant username; you may simply replace your existing unblock request with a new one. 331dot (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OscarRomeoOscarRomeo2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

OscarRomeoOscarRomeo2019 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

suggested amended to name

Decline reason:

Procedural; paring down to one open unblock request. GoldenRing (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "Username" aspect was not meant as a specific suggestion, but as an example of an acceptable format. You should replace "username" with your choice of name. Do you really want "username" as your username? Simply edit your existing request. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed your username from SparkEnergyWiki, which resolves that matter; someone else will review your request, but you will need to address your violation of WP:COI and WP:PAID, following the block notice instructions to "Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked." 331dot (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I would like to submit some general amends in the 'talk' section of the Spark Energy account, full declaring my 'link' with the company, in line with Wiki Guidelines. The original edit request was intended to be fully transparent. It is based on the description of Spark which is currently in the intro of the Wikipedia page. I have a suggested amend which is more factually accurate - including up to date citation.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OscarRomeoOscarRomeo2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to submit some general amends in the 'talk' section of the Spark Energy account, full declaring my 'link' with the company, in line with Wiki Guidelines. The original edit request was intended to be fully transparent. It is based on the description of Spark which is currently in the intro of the Wikipedia page. I have a suggested amend which is more factually accurate - including up to date citation.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; paring down to one open request. GoldenRing (talk) 12:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OscarRomeoOscarRomeo2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to submit some general amends in the 'talk' section of the Spark Energy page, fully declaring my link with the company, in line with Wiki Guidelines on potential conflicts of interest.The original edit request was intended to be fully transparent. It is based on the description of Spark which is currently in the intro of the Wikipedia page. I have a suggested amend which is more factually accurate - including up to date citation.

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive to questions, stale unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

OscarRomeoOscarRomeo2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24267 was submitted on Mar 11, 2019 11:48:27. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am considering this request, but we normally expect editors to have accounts for the purpose of improving Wikipedia, not merely for updating information related to their company. Do you have any intention of working on Wikipedia beyond the edits suggested in your unblock request? GoldenRing (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]