User talk:Avantiputra7

Avantiputra7, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Avantiputra7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vedic period may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

dans les litteratures Indo-Aryennes'' ed. [[Colette Caillat|Caillat]], Paris, 97–265.}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Avantiputra7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gautama Buddha

Compliments; good edits. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Avantiputra7 (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indus Valley Civilization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khasi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Work and now do a Mughal Empire Map

You are doing a very work. Can you prepare 1) a single compact map of Mughal Empire's expansion under Babur to Akbar to Aurangzeb and 2) another map of India in 1525 (just prior to the Mughals) where Vijayanagar was at its zenith expansion in the south, Rajputs were in the Rajputana and Central India , Gajapati Kingdom in the East and Lodi Sultanate in the Gangetic Plain (UP & Bihar mainly)?

If you can do these works, put the two maps then in the History of India wiki Page.Ghatus (talk) 07:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll try to collect sources and do these some time this month. Avantiputra7 (talk) 20:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Painted Grey Ware culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vedic religion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indus script

If you had read the lead before, you would find:- it is undeciphered, and no underlying language has been identified. There is no known bilingual inscription. The script does not show any significant changes over time.

There is no need to add a different view of 2 people to the lead then, it is becoming repetitive. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I saw that. But the question of "whether the Indus symbols were a writing system" logically leads to a discussion of what the symbols could actually be, if not writing. As it stands, I think the lede gives undue weight in favor of the Brahmic hypothesis, which is by no means favored by most scholars. But I will leave it as is. Avantiputra7 (talk) 11:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On Battle of the Ten Kings, you should not insert any dates. Because there is no scholarly agreement about the dating. Other author said that battle took during 3750 BCE. But one-one citations are not enough for making these huge claims. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated the date to infobox. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Beautiful maps; thanks! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maps#2

File:Indo-European migrations v02.03.png

Indo-European migrations

Here's my first try! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Is there any key for the red, green, etc arrows? Avantiputra7 (talk) 09:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	About time you get one; I highly appreciate your contributions. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! Avantiputra7 (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Avantiputra7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ecbatana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Don't remove the edits made by me because only after much studying & knowing I have edited them. Yaditiva (talk) 10:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you (Yaditiva) simply changed the dates at various articles, ignoring the sources there. I.e., Wendy Doniger on the Kama Sutra: "The Kamasutra is the oldest extant Hindu textbook of erotic love. It was composed in Sanskrit, the literary language of ancient India, probably in North India and probably sometime in the third century." Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citation tool

Hi Avantiputra, The "Citation tool for Google Books" at Help:Citation tools can convert a Google Books url into a full citation. Please try it out. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 17:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this looks very useful! Avantiputra7 (talk) 22:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ashoka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kalinga

Chandragupta Maurya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kalinga

Maurya Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kalinga

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vatsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avanti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kosala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuru (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

	Sage of India
	In appreciation for your excellent work on Indian History related articles. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 08:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Avantiputra7 (talk) 07:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Avantiputra7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Avantiputra7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citevar

Please can you fix these edits from 2017. They need full details for the cited sources and they should be formatted in the same style as the citations that were already in place at the point when you edited the article. See WP:CITEVAR. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush:

Fixed (I think) -Avantiputra7 (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting expansion and update edit support

Hi,

Season's greetings

I am looking for proactive expansion and update support/input help the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles, if possible. Even if you feel focus area bit different still contribution of few line may help bring in some different perspective and also help Wikipedia goal of neutrality. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.

Islamic advice literature

Your user ID was selected randomly (for sake of neutrality) from related other articles changes list related to Literature.

Thanks, warm regards and greetings

Bookku (talk) 10:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your help

Hi there. I was impressed by your gif(?) map at Maurya Empire. I have an FA that I'm trying to update and save from being FAR'd. It is Political history of Mysore and Coorg (1565–1760). It is the history of a geographical region that was properly defined only after this history had ended. (Sort of like India's history!) Anyway, the region was defined by the British: the princely state of Mysore and the province (i.e. of British India) of Coorg. Needless to say, this region had been ruled by a succession of different rulers. The history begins with the defeat of the Vijaynagara empire in 1565 and the empire's gradual breakup. The rule by Bijapur, Golconda, Marathas, and the Mughals follows. Other regions fall under the rule of the Wodeyars of Mysore, the Nayakas of Ikkeri, and the subedars of Sira, not to mention the Rajas of Coorg. There are maps in the article showing the boundaries of these regimes. Do you think it might be possible to make a gif that shows the political boundaries changing dynamically? Best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 20:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fowler&fowler: Yes, that can certainly be done. I am currently looking over those maps to familiarize myself with the details, and I believe that I can have a gif ready in the next few days. Just let me know if there are any more specifications you want me to take note of. -Avantiputra7 (talk) 03:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Avantiputra7: Great! Thanks. I might have some other old British maps that are not in the article. If I do, I'll send them to you later today. Best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 11:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Age

In this edit, you added a citation of Kulke & Rothermund 2004, p. 93 at the end of the sentence:

This period has been considered as the Golden Age of India by some historians, although this characterisation has been disputed by other historians.

I've removed that citation because it does not clearly support either part of the statement. They do not use the term "Golden Age" on page 93 (or elsewhere in the text), but neither do they say that this was a conscious decision or if so why they made it. The term does appear in the book's index, on page 414, where it says "Golden Age see Guptas". This suggests that they know it is a term that readers might look for, and that those readers would expect information about the Guptas, but doesn't say that some historians call the classical age of the Guptas the Golden Age, or express an opinion on whether that's an apt appellation or not.

If you think I made a mistake, and would like to re-add the citation, please explain how it supports the statement. Since the lead is supposed to summarize the body, you might also address somewhere in the body (perhaps in the legacy section) the debate as to whether it was a "Golden Age" or not. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce: Yes, you're right, of course. Honestly I'm actually not sure why I got that citation wrong, but I checked and I think that I was mis-remembering the passage from pages 85-87, which rather has a different bearing, concluding thus: "The much maligned 'dark period' [between Mauryas and Guptas] was actually the harbinger of the classical age." Oh well, thanks for the correction. -Avantiputra7 (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Yes! Thanks for your efforts at Vijayanagara Empire! Looking forward to the final result. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]