User talk:Ayushv550

Welcome!

Hello, Ayushv550, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 07:38, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of content from List of largest snakes

Hello, I'm BarrelProof. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of largest snakes without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request to provide edit summaries to explain your edits

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of largest snakes does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —BarrelProof (talk) 00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another unexplained removal of well-sourced content

I notice you did it again, removing a lot of reliably sourced content and replacing some of it with unsourced content, without providing any edit summary. Please don't do that. If you disagree with the content of the article, I suggest to start a discussion at Talk:List of largest snakes, so that the issues can be discussed and a consensus can be found. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again with List of largest snakes

You seem to have done it again. Without providing any explanation, you changed the weight provided for the Burmese python and removed the citation for the prior weight listed in the List of largest snakes. You also introduced a picture for the dark-spotted anaconda that seems to be a picture of the wrong species. Can you please explain what you are trying to do, and why you are trying to do it? You should provide comments in the WP:Edit summary box to explain what you are doing. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of largest cats

Hi, I'm Galobtter. Ayushv550, thanks for creating List of largest cats!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Add sources for the figures you have in this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of largest land carnivorans) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of largest land carnivorans, Ayushv550!

Wikipedia editor Elmidae just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The sourcing of this list was quite unsuitable. I suggest looking at the individual articles of the species listed, and using authoritative sources used there regarding max/average mass.

To reply, leave a comment on Elmidae's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot just grab images off the web!

Ayushv550 - I have just reverted all your image additions, and proposed everything you uploaded at Commons for deletion (see here). You CANNOT just grab whatever images you fancy off the web and paste them into Wikipedia! Basically, everything you wish to use has to be your own work OR made specifically available for free use. None of the images you uploaded to Commons fall into these categories. Please take more care in this regard - Wikipedia has (by necessity) an extremely strict stance when it comes to copyright violations. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tallest extant birds on earth moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tallest extant birds on earth, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Cervids moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Largest Cervids, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of largest extant lizards

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ayushv550, thanks for creating List of largest extant lizards!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ayushv550. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another unhelpful, unsourced change to List of largest snakes

Hello, I'm BarrelProof. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of largest snakes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 06:42, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ocean sunfish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congener (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]