User talk:Aftabbanoori

Welcome

Hello, Aftabbanoori, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Faizan -Let's talk! 13:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Archives

1

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:57, Wednesday, November 6, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan

Hi Aftabbanoori!

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan[reply]

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive

Hi Aftabbanoori!

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

File:Yellow pot.jpg

Hi, File:Yellow pot.jpg clearly shows Cascabela thevetia (= Thevetia peruviana), not Allamanda cathartica. Please, have a look at the position of the leaves. Regards --Franz Xaver (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Name

I have attempted to change your User page title but i could not. Sorry :|. I have found this page which describes a way to do it. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook

I'm not seeing the dots you described.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your tireless help at the Teahouse. If politeness and neatness had a name, that name would be Aftab Banoori. w.carter*-Talk* 12:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sunshine! Thanks for your contribs!

		Sunshine!
		Hello Aftabbanoori! Bananasoldier (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding `{{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}}` to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Bananasoldier (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse

Hello Aftabbanoori,

Although I appreciate your attempt to answer questions at the Teahouse, it is really important that your answers be correct. Your answer about the autoconfirmed status was clearly wrong. An editor must have BOTH four days of editing AND ten edits to gain that status. Please do not try to answer Teahouse questions unless you are 99%+ sure that your answer is correct. Do not guess. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please read WP:minor edits. I see that most of your edits are marked as minor, and many do not comply with those criteria. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Banoori

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.SovalValtos (talk) 11:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what you have been told. You must not repeatedly add unsourced material. Similarly you were told that before you add "notable" people to the article you should write the articles demonstrating that they are WP:notable in wWikipedia's terms. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aftabbanoori. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Banoori, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=I edit in good faith and do not want to damage any article, I want to be a trust worthy editor, sorry if my eidts were not liked in future i will be more careful, Aftab Banoori ^(Talk) 22:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

Hello Aftabbanoori. The reason for this block is continued disruption, by way of repeated additions of unsourced content. When fellow editors have attempted to communicate and refer you to respective policy in this regard, you have a history of deleting said messages, ignoring the warnings and continue to persistently add problematic and unsourced content. If unblocked, what specific articles do you intend to make changes to, and what sources will you be citing? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aftabbanoori (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Yamaguchi, Once again I wish to say, that neither I have added any nasty thing nor I have deleted anything from the article, I reverted the article to earlier date, I am sorry if my this action was inappropriate, I love Wikki, and want to work with community as a trust worthy editor, in future i will be more careful and ensure that my actions are not disruptive, please unblock me, best wishes and regards. Aftab Banoori ^(Talk) 03:29, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please post only one unblock request at a time. Yamaguchi asked you a direct question ("If unblocked, what specific articles do you intend to make changes to, and what sources will you be citing?"), and you have replied with meaningless platitudes. If you want to be unblocked, we expect you to explain specifically how you intend to avoid causing disruption in the future. Just repeating "I will be good now" tells us nothing about your understanding.. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition to general disruptive editing Aftabbanoori seems to have never understood what Wikipedia is and isn't (or simply not caring), having among other things confused WP with Instagram by repeatedly adding their own low quality family snapshots on multiple articles, and repeatedly edit-warring against multiple users to keep the pictures in the articles, in spite of being politely told by other users why their behaviour was inappropriate (see this message I posted on their talk page in 2014, and this message posted by another user in 2016; the latter being prompted by Aftabbanoori over and over again adding a very low quality snapshot of themself or a friend in front of a car on Rolls-Royce Silver Ghost, a photo of such abysmally low quality that it was later deleted on Commons). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 09:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aftabbanoori (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admins, Its been a long time since I am blocked, I request one chance, I fully understand, that i was wrong, in future I will be more careful in editing. Mostly I edit about the flowers and plants (see my uploads), I hope you will unblock me, best wishes, Aftab Banoori ^(Talk) 04:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't sufficient. Please answer the questions which have been asked of you, specifically. Yamla (talk) 13:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aftabbanoori (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Yamla, I want to edit articles about flowers and plants, to me reliable source is, what is published in text books or distributed by reliable news agencies

Decline reason:

User has been given multiple opportunities to answer questions about specific topics of interest but has not been able to express an appropriate response. Revoking talk page access as well. only (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user has finally tried to answer the question asked. I would say they deserve one chance. Tkwikihelper (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The account User:Tkwikihelper is presently blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. Aftabbanoori, in consideration of your unblock request please demonstrate that you have competence regarding reliable sources by identifying a specific article you would make changes to, indicate what those changes would be, and what sources you would provide to support your changes. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is also simply not the case that this user has finally tried to answer the question asked. The user has once again given general platitudes. If they are able to specifically answer the questions posted by Yamaguchi先生, great. We can consider unblocking. Otherwise, it's time to revoke talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aftabbanoori (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admins, I have been waiting for you decision, I have requested for unblock, please unblock me, I understand fully Wiki polices, and in future i will be more careful, and try to be a good editor, thanks and best regard, Aftab Banoori ^(Talk) 12:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: no more than one unblock request at a time. only (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

only (talk) 13:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]