User talk:Analytics Amit

Speedy deletion nomination of Autonomous Analytics

Hello Analytics Amit,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Autonomous Analytics for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

_{Vermont | reply here} 10:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Analytics Amit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont understand why was I locked. Analytics Amit (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not for introducing any new theories, fields, or other original research to the world. To merit an article on Wikipedia, a subject must have been written about in independent reliable sources and as such already be known to the world, enough so that those sources wrote about it in depth. If no one has written about this field, it is far too soon for an article about it. Since you state your intentions here are to publicize this new field, the block is valid. As there currently seems to be no benefit to the project in unblocking you, I am declining this request. If you make another unblock request, you will need to agree to not post original research and indicate what you will do on Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 23:36, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was trying to introduce wikipedia to a new branch in analytics which I believe might take over the analytics world in the next few years. I have not and will not use the page to direct to my work in the field. my soul intention is to introduce wikipedia to this new emerging style of analytics.