User talk:Apyule

Helmholtz Coils

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing of Helmholtz Coils prompts some comments:

Under Wikipedia conventions found at Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the c in coil in the article title should be lower-case, and the word coil in the title should be singular. Since there was already an article titled Helmholtz coil, with a lower-case c and singular title, the one with the plural and the capital C should be a redirect page pointing to the one with the lower-case c and the singular coil. Knowing these conventions is a way of avoiding the problem of needing to merge two similarly titled articles on the same subject. After the information from your new article gets incorporated into the other article, the new one should become a redirect page.

Conventionally one highlights the title word or title phrase at its first appearance, thus: Helmholtz coils are named in honor of Hermann von Helmholtz etc., etc., etc.

Happy editing!

Michael Hardy 20:51, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Nikki Hemming

I have rewritten her article in order to establish notability. I would be grateful if you could have a look at the page and see what you think. Capitalistroadster 05:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

German WMD

The article Germany and weapons of mass destruction has been mostly rewritten and I think it is a good, NPOV article though slightly stubbish. I was wondering if you would reconsider your vote at its VFD, since the POV issues seemed to be a major reason for your vote to delete. Thanks. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:11, 2005 August 14 (UTC)

Harrow Football

Following your comments last week, I've had a go at writing the rules for Harrow Football. Take a look and tell me what you think! Thanks --Jamesedmo 21:30, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. You already have! --Jamesedmo 21:32, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alleged causes of Hurricane Katrina

I realize that there were strong feelings on both sides with respect to the outcome of the AfD for this article, now located at Alternative theories regarding Hurricane Katrina. I would like to assure those who expressed concerns about the content, tone, and potential for degradation of this article that I intend for it to continue to exist only as long as is necessary to draw the contributions of fringe theorists away from the more substantial Hurricane Katrina articles. Once interest in this topic dies down, I'll quietly trim and merge this information into the appropriate general-topic articles. In the interim, I will carefully watch this page to prevent it from being abused, and I will continue to work towards making this article NPOV, properly sourced, and useful to those seeking an accurate record of the hysterics that so often follows catastrophe. Cheers. -- BD2412 ^talk 00:55, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

I'm sure this was well-intentioned but generally one does not change other people's texts on talk pages, not even to improve them. It's not an iron-clad rule, but I thought I'd let you know someone might get angry over an edit like this: some people are very touchy about it. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up, I'll make sure that I'm more careful which namespace I'm in in the future. --Apyule 07:57, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Sarfatti

Hi, thanks for your help on this. Unfortunately, Jack did go ballistic, as I feared he might (I've dealt with him before). What do you think of this threat he place on my user talk page? This is the first time I've had to deal with something like this, so any advice would be appreciated. (Please reply on my user talk page).---CH (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response to your message. Uncle Ed 13:31, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jornbarger

Hello, I noticed you tagged Jornbarger as an A7 WP:CSD deletion. A7 only applies to people, not to anything else, unfortunately. Jornbarger will, sadly, just have to go through AfD. Yours, --Blackcap | talk 05:07, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I listed it under A7 because I contend that it is about a person. Looking more closely though, a redirect to Jorn Barger might be better. --Apyule 05:46, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but it doesn't actually say that, so it can't be speedied under A7. It can, however, and has been, speedied under A6, the attack page clause, for being an attack page of Jorn Barger, whom I didn't realize existed. Either way, it dies, and I'm satisfied :). Take care, --Blackcap | talk 16:20, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Teasers/Trivia:

Hi, I'm just posting a friendly notice stating that I have got Brain Teasers/Trivia on my user page that you're welcome to have a go at. Will post new questions one day after they have been answered. Thanks... Spawn Man 09:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

I do more than just remove vandalism. But that is the main thing I do. Is there a reason that I cant be an admin that mainly removes vandalism? --☺Adam1213☺|talk 06:51, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is no reason that an admin can't focus on vandalism. However, when most of a users edits are reverting vandalism it is hard to tell much about them as an editor. --Apyule 06:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

a heads-up on the List of Guantanamo Bay detainees

Greetings,

Since you voted to keep the article List of Guantanamo Bay detainees I thought I would give you a "heads-up". A copyright violation was filed against the article, on October 11th. It was filed by someone who had voted to delete the article on October 5th.

I believe that the copyright violation is entirely bogus. I believe it is bogus because, as explained in Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service, lists of facts, like lists of names, cannot be copyright. This Feist v. Rural case went all the way to the US Supreme Court, which made the possibly counter-intuitive ruling that the amount of effort someone put in to compiling a list plays no role in determining whether that list is eligible for copyright protection.

Even if alphabetic lists of names could be copyright, I believe the wikipedia list would not be violating copyright since the list was compiled from various sources.

Yes, I have considered that this user invoked a bogus copyright violation to achieve a result that failed in the {AfD}. Yes, I asked them to terminate the copyright violation process, in light of Feist v Rural. They declined. The backlog in the administrators dealing with copyright violations seems to be on the order of a month long.

Anyhow, I wanted the people who had shown interest in the article to not freak out, or feel betrayed, by seeing the copyright violation tag. -- Geo Swan 11:21, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :-) -- Geo Swan 15:09, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you on deletion

I agree with you on deletion. My first encounter with an {AfD} was three weeks ago. Since then I have had almost a dozen {AfD}s filed on articles I started, all of them articles that touch on the "global war on terror". -- Geo Swan 11:21, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

White Boy Accuses Brown Boy of White Wash

Your commentsabout me notwithstanding, why not take a look at the following articles and tell me if I "whitewashed" the issue as you put it. Is the final product better? If not, feel free to revert to the last Geo Swan edit. For example, Clive Stafford Smith, Gareth Peirce Benyam Mohammed. As I posted on Geo Swan's talk page, e.g.

have edited Benyam Mohammed to cure the obvious POV issues and have added basic facts for any bio, such as date of birth, full name, the dates of events. The problem, Geo Swan is that when you create these hundreds of politically motivated stubs, for the sole purpose of getting more hits on Google, that you forget to include the basic information.

For the record, my position is numerous poorly written articles about Guantanamo does not vitiate. Joaquin Murietta 16:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on my talk page notwithstanding...

I have very little respect for bigots. So, let's talk about what you meant by "white wash" and then we'll address Geo Swan and Cactus Flower's comments about Mexicans, Mexican Bandits and Right Wing Cubans. Joaquin Murietta 07:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be engaged in an active political campaign trying to remove content that is potentially damaging to the current government of the USA. Examples of this include the AfD for Bush on the Couch and the copyvio on List of Guantanamo Bay detainees. While we're at it, before this gets any further please read this very carefully. --Apyule 11:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I am not, nor did I did not send this to fifty people, including you. My goal is to write well written articles. Joaquin Murietta 12:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Jamal Kiyemba

Jamal Kiyemba is one of the many Geo swan articles that I sought to improve. Please tell me if you object to the final product. Joaquin Murietta 16:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whaling

Hi Apyule,

Having a wee bit of difficulty understanding why you reverted the whaling article (rv POV vandalism). Alleging that Japan is operating under a "guise" of scientific research is a POV .. I could just as easily allege that Greenpeace is an NGO that operates under a "guise" of environmental activism when in actual fact, they are simply in it for the money ;)- both are extreme POV´s ..

In addition, the NGO interference in the IWC leading up to the 1982 moratorium and beyond is reasonably well documented. Not only does it provide a counterpoint to the obvious anti-whaling bias that pervades the article, it specifically shows that "vote buying" is not restricted to the Japanese - or do you disagree? SammytheSeal 12:08, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do disagree. Dealing with the points that you raise:

There are strong arguments that the Japanese whaling program is of very little scientific value compared to its commercial/social value.
Your comment about Greenpeace is a position that, while hard to refute, has little basis in reality.
Buying votes at the International Whaling Commission is difficult to analyse objectively as there are so many facets to international relations, but there is a very close relation between countries receiving aid from Japan and joining the IWC

I will add sources and references to the whaling articles as soon as I have time. It would be great if you would do the same. --Apyule 13:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it looked like a mistake, but it looks like there is a few clashes of opinion on the whaling articles just now, so we need to be careful to work well with each other, Thanks. Pcb21| Pete

voting on afd

It maybe that articles on which I have voted to delete have been based on reliable sources but I think the burden of citing sources lies with the creating editor. Wikipedia:Verifiability is a policy whcih I believe is an absolute must for all articles. I hope that any afd closers would disregard my vote if reliable sources are added to articles after my vote and before closure — I will try to modify my votes to make this clearer. --redstucco 09:29, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Scott base & erebus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scott base & erebus.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Canley 07:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beer categories.

Hi Apyule, I hope you're sober. It has been suggested by User:BrianSmithson that the Beer and brewery categories should be renamed. The proposal has been supported by User:Syrthiss, and supported and expanded by myself. The notion is that the regional categories should follow the format of "Beer and breweries in Africa" /Europe/Asia/North America/South America/Oceania. "Brewers and breweries" could also be renamed "Beer and breweries by region". And all the countries should also be renamed (and merged if needed) as, for example, "Beer and breweries of Germany", "Beer and breweries of Britain", "Beer and breweries of Poland". The word in each case would be beer rather than beers to allow for general articles on beer culture in each region as well as individual beers.

Comments, suggestions, objections and simple votes to Wiki Beer Project SilkTork 15:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User conduct RfC on Brian G. Crawford

Thought you might be interested in this:Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Brian_G._Crawford. -- backburner001 16:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Apyule 14:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Hopefully, something good will come of this. -- backburner001 16:20, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poll

Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: [1] Sober up and come and vote! SilkTork 12:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub-Sorting

No problem! Just trying to find something to do on a boring Tuesday morning.StvnLunsford 14:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ivory Coast move

Since you participated in previous discussions on Ivory Coast, you might be interested in the requested move at Talk:Côte_d'Ivoire#...Requested_move. — AjaxSmack 08:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Don't bite the newbies

Do you have any specific examples? A really vague statement like this makes it hard for me to know exactly what you're talking about. Wibbble 12:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything wrong with that - my edit comment was perfectly reasonable, and it wasn't a correction since as far as I'm aware, Nokia say that the N95 doesn't actually support SDHC. I don't check the number of edits a user has made before I revert what is, AFAIK, incorrect information, and I don't think that saying 'if the N95 supports SDHC cards, please cite the Nokia reference, then it can be added to the article' is in any way biting the newbie. It was a polite request for sources, in case I was mistaken about the SDHC support Wibbble 17:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD notification

First off I apologise if this is considered an attempt to "vote-stack", but I think it's a slightly different issue since you already" voted to keep the article George W. Bush pretzel incident back in March...it's now back on the AfD list, despite it's earlier "Keep" verdict - and I'd appreciate an extra voice if your opinions are unchanged. It is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 George W. Bush pretzel incident (2nd nomination), much thanks. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 04:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CMSimple

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article CMSimple, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Jackaranga 21:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Serene on stand.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Serene on stand.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Serene on stand.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Serene on stand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Serene on stand.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DJBullfish (talk) 07:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Ajudua

Hi. I saw you did some edits on this article, and you expressed doubt about whether the guy deserved an article. I came across the article in the AfD list, at which time it had been stripped down to one line. I was curious enough to check for sources and then expand to a more complete version - the guy really does seem to be a notable con artist. Then I had second thoughts. Is this the kind of subject an encyclopedia should contain? I suppose there are truly notable criminals like Jack the Ripper and Ponzi that do belong, but I don't know about Ajudua. The AfD has just been closed with "keep". Maybe a mistake, even though I voted for that. This is to ask you, if you care to, to keep watching the article and if I don't get there first to revert any unsourced edits. This one gives me a very queasy feeling. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 03:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup

Hi there. Just inviting youmto the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)[reply]

February Melbourne Meetup

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 03:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

Melbourne Meetup

Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus
Previous: 25 November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 04:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Penguin Liberation Front

The article Penguin Liberation Front has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for refs since 2011

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PLF logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PLF logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Apyule. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Apyule. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Sedevacantist Antipope" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sedevacantist Antipope and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Sedevacantist Antipope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 00:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]