User talk:Asb7uf
Welcome!
|
August 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the Total Recall (1990 film) plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm Doniago. Your recent edit to the page Starship Troopers (film) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Asb7uf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vitamin C (singer), you may be blocked from editing. Caden cool 18:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Asb7uf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Asb7uf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Asb7uf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Adm. Robert P. Burke.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Adm. Robert P. Burke.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radioland Murders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for February 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quentin Tarantino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Steen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Bay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 6 Underground.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for January 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Demme, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Napier and John Glover.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
The Evil Dead
[edit]Hi,
I have reverted your edit to The Evil Dead. The credits and script state 'Scott'; Scotty might have been an occasional nickname in the film. AussieWikiDan (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
I have again reverted your edits because the language was not encyclopaedic. For more general advice on editing see the Contributing to Wikipedia page.
If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
AussieWikiDan (talk) 04:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timothy Woodward Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Messner.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Carrie (1976 film), you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Major film studios, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Coolcaesar (talk) 23:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catherine Hardwicke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Dekker.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steven Brill (filmmaker), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Farley.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
[edit] Hello Asb7uf! Your additions to CopyCat Killers have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 13:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Stop removing film nationalities
[edit]I have no idea why you're doing this, but stop removing the word "American" every time it appears in American films. MOS:FILM says to include this information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for April 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mel Brooks on screen and stage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Carey.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jay Chandrasekhar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kevin Heffernan and Brian Cox.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Your obsession with removing the word "American"
[edit]If you don't stop doing this, I'm going to block you again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit] Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Robert Zemeckis, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at David Fincher, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:35, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- I restored the table of actors because of sources talking about the frequent collabs, but your crew table was a violation of WP:NOR. Binksternet (talk) 02:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Sections listing collaborators
[edit]Stop adding unreferenced sections listing frequent collaborators. Such sections must be based on observations in WP:SECONDARY sources, as in Joss Whedon#Frequent casting where two sources are cited. You can't just decide on your own that a filmmaker needs to have their collaborators listed. Binksternet (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan Reitman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Gordon.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)If you continue this campaign to remove the word "American", you'll be indefinitely blocked until you explain yourself. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Terry Gilliam. Binksternet (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Woody Allen filmography. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit] Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop ignoring our requests to communicate. You are making everyone's life more difficult, which is going to end with you getting you blocked for longer and longer periods. --Muhandes (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Idol (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Jerry Kyd
[edit] Thanks for contributing to the article Jerry Kyd. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Recent edit reversion
[edit]In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of best-selling singles of the 2010s in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Martin.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Gatekeeping
[edit]Hi! Gatekeeping film debuts based on personal and underdeveloped notions of career "establishment" does not strike me as constructive editing.--Asqueladd (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- I am again warning you that gatekeeping film debut sections based on (very) underdeveloped, opaque (and personal) notions of career establishment does not look like constructive editing.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am again warning that you are no gatekeeper.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit] Your edit to Skatetown, U.S.A. has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 21:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Film Plot
[edit]Please read the WP:FILMPLOT guidelines. 700 words is the recommended limit not a target and the point of the plot section is to include enough information to "complement wider coverage"
(ie provide enough information so that other sections such as Production or the Reception section don't need to redundantly explain main plot points again).
If a film plot has already been summarized concisely there is no need to expand the plot section right up to the limit. If you feel that some important detail is missing you will need to explain in your edit summary what you are adding and why you feel it is necessary to expand the plot section. -- 109.76.138.125 (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you are a listening. 700 words is a limit not a target. (diff) (diff)
- I don't want to report you, I want you to stop and think about what you are doing and also properly explain why exactly you are expanding the plot section in future Help:Edit_summary not simply stating the fact that you have expanded right up to the word limit. -- 109.76.132.151 (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC)