User talk:Bulklana

This is Bulklana's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justinian Caire (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Any Wikipedia article should start with a lead that gives a summary of why the subject is notable. In this case, I can't find any statement anywhere in the article that tells me why this subject is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justinian Caire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bulklana! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justinian Caire has been accepted

Justinian Caire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludwig Brieger has been accepted

Ludwig Brieger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madeleine Wade

The article Madeleine Wade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actress with no significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madeleine Wade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madeleine Wade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine Wade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 22:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kraiburg TPE

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kraiburg TPE, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help with page

Looking for standard template. JosephBenning (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph. Editing a page in the visual editor, click insert - template Bulklana (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can search for the template you need here: Category:Wikipedia templates Bulklana (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. JosephBenning (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Bulklana,

I noticed that you tagged W.i.S.H. for a Proposed deletion 17 minutes after the article was created! 17 minutes is not enough time for an editor to create and develop an article, much less reference it properly. I just deleted another article that you tagged about 40 minutes after it was created. I understand you are not a new page patroller, but the rule of thumb for patrollers is that they should allow at least an hour after a page creator has stopped editing a brand new article before tagging it for any type of deletion, CSD, PROD or AFD. I'm sure if you had just created an article, you would not appreciate an editor quickly tagging it for deletion while you were still working on it.

Thank you for your consideration for your fellow content creators! If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia or its deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll try to be more careful in the future.Bulklana (talk) 08:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bulklana. Thank you for your work on Ilan Strauss. Alalch E., while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for contributing the new article. Please identify souces among the sources used in the article that meet all three following criteria: (1) reliable secondary source, (2) independent of the subject, (3) contains significant coverage. Please refer to WP:RS if you are unsure about answering this question, and you may also ask about this on the article's talk page, your talk page, or at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Sincerely

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 09:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alalch E.: Hello, thank you for your attention. I will definitely continue working on this article and will improve it and supplement it with links Bulklana (talk) 09:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. But do kindly list the sources that meet the aforementioned criteria, or I might convert the article to a draft for improvement (after which you will be able to follow the WP:AFC process for it to be accepted as an article). —Alalch E. 09:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dnepr Kherson

Hello, Bulklana. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dnepr Kherson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dnepr Kherson

Hello, Bulklana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dnepr Kherson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francisco Guinea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Francisco Guinea, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jdcomix (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Franco Nori

Hello, Bulklana,

Thank you for creating Franco Nori.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Was Franco Nori born in Venezuela, per the text, or born in Genoa, per the infobox? Neither have reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goki Eda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goki Eda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goki Eda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Xegma(talk) 09:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your edit to Draft:Jaffer Khan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bulklana. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Jaffer Khan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bulklana. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bulklana|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Bilby (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bulklana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon. I apologize for letting the wikipedia administration think that I am an unscrupulous author for a number of reasons. I have thoroughly studied the rules of wikipedia for conflicts of interest and copyright, and in the future I undertake to fulfill them in full faith. Please pay attention to the large number of constructive edits and articles written by me. I want to continue to make useful contributions. Please unblock me and allow me to continue contributing to wikipedia. I promise to be more careful about conflicts of interest and copyrights from now on. Bulklana (talk) 17:52, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're going to need more than your word here, please demonstrate your understanding of what was wrong with your editing and what you will do differently. The main reason for the block is violating WP:PAID by not disclosing a paid editing relationship. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Bulklana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the main reason for the blocking. I was actually asked to write an article and it appears that there is a conflict of interest. Yes, it was a bad article, I'm sure other editors will make it better if they see fit.

For my part, I have familiarized myself with the rules and policies of wikipedia regarding conflict of interest and paid editing. ( WP:COI, WP:PAID) I think a good practice is not to get involved in topics that may have a conflict of interest at all.

As you can see, I have a good history of editing existing articles and writing my own articles. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue to edit wikipedia. Bulklana (talk) 08:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I understand the main reason for the blocking. I was actually asked to write an article and it appears that there is a conflict of interest. Yes, it was a bad article, I'm sure other editors will make it better if they see fit.
For my part, I have familiarized myself with the rules and policies of wikipedia regarding conflict of interest and paid editing. ( [[WP:COI]], [[WP:PAID]]) I think a good practice is not to get involved in topics that may have a conflict of interest at all. 
As you can see, I have a good history of editing existing articles and writing my own articles. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue to edit wikipedia.  [[User:Bulklana|Bulklana]] ([[User talk:Bulklana#top|talk]]) 08:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I understand the main reason for the blocking. I was actually asked to write an article and it appears that there is a conflict of interest. Yes, it was a bad article, I'm sure other editors will make it better if they see fit.
For my part, I have familiarized myself with the rules and policies of wikipedia regarding conflict of interest and paid editing. ( [[WP:COI]], [[WP:PAID]]) I think a good practice is not to get involved in topics that may have a conflict of interest at all. 
As you can see, I have a good history of editing existing articles and writing my own articles. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue to edit wikipedia.  [[User:Bulklana|Bulklana]] ([[User talk:Bulklana#top|talk]]) 08:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I understand the main reason for the blocking. I was actually asked to write an article and it appears that there is a conflict of interest. Yes, it was a bad article, I'm sure other editors will make it better if they see fit.
For my part, I have familiarized myself with the rules and policies of wikipedia regarding conflict of interest and paid editing. ( [[WP:COI]], [[WP:PAID]]) I think a good practice is not to get involved in topics that may have a conflict of interest at all. 
As you can see, I have a good history of editing existing articles and writing my own articles. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue to edit wikipedia.  [[User:Bulklana|Bulklana]] ([[User talk:Bulklana#top|talk]]) 08:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

WP:HONEST

Hello, This BLP Draft:Jaffer Khan was flagged to me as confirmed UPE. Could you please confirm this honestly so I can understand that you will avoid UPE in the future? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I confirm. Bulklana (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm what? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I confirm that I had a conflict of interest and was interested in writing the article. In the future, I promise not to mess with such articles and edits again Bulklana (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPE/COI

As you are involved in at least one current deletion discussion, can you please let us know which of your articles were paid editing, and which ones have a COI? Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 10:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of my articles have been paid for and I have no conflict of interest except for the one above. Bulklana (talk) 12:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

However, all your BLPs appear highly promotional and resemble paid editing. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have writing biographies of scientists. I assure you that they don't pay me for it. I like writing articles. Maybe I am not always good at it, but it is my way of learning English. Bulklana (talk) 13:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And Graph Tech Guitar Labs? - Bilby (talk) 13:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No conflict of interest here. I think it's a nice article with gifts gallery. Please take a look at my other articles and edits. Also I am actively editing new articles in the New pages section. Bulklana (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that on May 1 a contractor on Upwork was hired to create an article on Graph Tech Guitar Labs, which you subsequently created the same day. The Upwork editor was then hired to add spam links for med.report on May 23, which you then added to HCPCS Level 2 [1], once again on the same day that the Upwork editor was hired. - Bilby (talk) 13:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Belarus and we don't have upwork. As for the history of the creation of this article, I wrote it longer than for a one day, you can look at the logs. Bulklana (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying that it took only one day to write. I'm saying that it is unreasonable to assume that there is a coincidence that you added spam the same day an Upwork editor was hired to add that spam, and started work on an article once again on the same day that the same upwork editor was hired to create it. - Bilby (talk) 14:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the history of my edits. There are lot of added and edited links. I honestly don't remember when exactly I added the one you're talking about, maybe I was chasing the number of edits at that time. Bulklana (talk) 14:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bilby. Any updates? Bulklana (talk) 20:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulklana,

This would be an amazing coincidence. I think the only way you will ever get a positive response to your unblock request is to be more forthcoming. Your word that you didn't do paid editing is insufficient with these incidents on Upwork. It's better (and probably your only hope) is to tell the truth, explain why what you did was not in accordance with Wikipedia's paid editing guidelines and describe how you will address this in the future. I can't see how else an admin will accept your request to be unblocked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a few paid edits, among them: link, an article on a guitar company, Madeleine Wade, Andrew Lowe. An article about doctor is not paid, I just saw this dude in a monitor advertising on Dubai airlines and thought since I'm writing a series about scientists, why not write about him.

In the future, I will avoid paid editing and conflicts of interest. And according to wikipedia policy, in the case of paid editing, everyone should disclose this on user page by adding the following information: {{paid|employer=name of employer|client=name of client}} Bulklana (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, here's what I gather. Initially, Bulklana only mentioned that Draft:Jaffer Khan was a paid article, but after @Liz's comments, they admitted there are a few more. I'm confident there are additional ones that haven’t been disclosed yet. Therefore, I would suggest keeping them blocked. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish. Also you can delet all my edits and published articles. Have a good day. Bulklana (talk) 18:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First, I’m not an admin here, so I don’t have the authority to do that. Second, even if I did, I have no interest in deleting your edits or articles. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Either way it is in your hands to unblock me and allow me to continue creating articles, or cancel the unblock request. Bulklana (talk) 20:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think an admin would be more likely to unblock you if you’re open about all your UPE edits. That’s all I can suggest for now. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 05:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing more to add. Bulklana (talk) 20:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elie Rizk

The article Elie Rizk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCER; WP:NMUSIC inapplicable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Algorithmic attention rents

The article Algorithmic attention rents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A concept only discussed by the authors of the concept; insufficient independent sourcing and fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ilan Strauss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilan Strauss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilan Strauss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Graph Tech Guitar Labs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graph Tech Guitar Labs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graph Tech Guitar Labs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]