[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Bybic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Bybic) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

  1. It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
  2. Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Bybic.com. Thank you. Filing Flunky (talk) 17:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bybic.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company, organization, or clients. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 17:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bybic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is my first time to use wiki,May be I wasn't well understood about the policy.So,When the system prompt me an article was violation,I didn't know how to do and what to do.Finally,My account was bloked.Now,I know policy clearly,Would you please unblock my account?Thanks!Bybic (talk) 18:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll have to follow the instructions above and request a new username; it's not allowed to have a username that represents a company. Further, you'll not be able to create the now-deleted article again. --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Hi. When you post an unblock request, you should not at the same time remove the block messages, as a reviewing admin will need to be able to see those to understand why you were blocked and to properly evaluate your request. Should your unblock be successful, you may then remove whatever messages you wish -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just how did I said?This is my first time~How can you judge a person death penalty who makes mistakes the first time! Bybic (talk) 18:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi. Nobody is imposing a "death penalty", and I have no doubt that your breach of the rules was indeed just an honest mistake. The block notice explains that your username is unacceptable and that you will need to request a change, and also explains that you probably will not be able to continue to make the same kind of edits as you did, as there appears to be a conflict of interest. It also explains what you need to do to request unblock, which is to use the {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} template - replace "Your proposed new username" with the username you wish to change to, and replace "Your reason here" with an explanation of how you will avoid the same problem in the future. I am going to technically close the current unblock request now, so that you can try again using the correct request - but if there is anything else you don't understand, please just ask here and I'll be happy to try to explain -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]