User talk:Bixn00dy

Welcome!

Hello, Bixn00dy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Henrik Palmgren, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henrik Palmgren

The article Henrik Palmgren has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henrik Palmgren

The article Henrik Palmgren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The sources in the article do not show notability as per WP:GNG. We would need to cover the subject based on the consensus among reliable sources, which would mean it would be an [arguably, I suppose] mostly negative biography. Based on notability and WP:BLP concerns, it seems like deletion is worth considering. There's still a little more research I'd want to do before sending it to AfD. FWIW I'm not familiar with the subject. Came across the article when someone added it to the alt-right navigational template.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henrik Palmgren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henrik Palmgren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Palmgren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tsumikiria (T/C) 06:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]