[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Cuetrax

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{Help me]]

re: Decline reason:

""You seem to be slightly confused about the situation. Allow me to clarify. In order to be unblocked you will need to agree to both of the following: you will not make any edits in regard to the subjects where you have a conflict of interest, you will change your username to something unrelated to the subjects where you have a conflict of interest. I hope this of some help in clarifying the situation. PhilKnight (talk) 20:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC)""

thank you philKnight for clarification, however I am not sure how to officially agree to the terms. Is there a form or a code to do so or do I just declare it here because I do Agree! and what do i do to change my user name should I just make a new account from scratch? I know this is based on my IP so whats the difference? also there as a whole bunch of text on my page about the links I posted can I just simply delete everything below in my talk page or is there another way to go about clearing all this text?

And I still dont know how to message users and or administrators I'd like to have a piece that was written about me edited by one of the previous editors who successfully edited the thread how do I go about that?

Cuetrax (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Cuetrax, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 03:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

September 2014

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Wu-Tang Clan affiliates has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of Wu-Tang Clan affiliates was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfwKI7xrpO4, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA3NpuMFXSQ, http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLA338BBB505A1038B, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBEPxqJpxW4, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rGuSuEFnC8, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR4TASbzImM, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR4TASbzImM, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moqKc92d1Kk, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFAV8Xhi_c8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Cuetrax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. INeverCry 06:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
    • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
    • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:51, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cuetrax (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a new user unfamiliar to the many policies of wiki it was an honest mistake to post the first day i opened my account I didnt know it was so involved I though the story I post just had to be accurate and truthful any violation was strictly in error in posting without reading the many restrictions that are largely confusing. I am an engineer/producer/cameo artist owner of cuetrax productions licensed in nyc whose works have been published and released by many of the individuals listed in the articles that I edited and I believe i deserve to be included therein please unblock my page and reconsider...in the future i intend on seeking help from other users and have a successful track record and petition them to submit on my behalf although i personally believe one should be able to reserve their natural unalienable rights and take credit for their own creative works that are publicly displayed

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and articles should be written from a neutral point of view. To that end, editors are strongly discouraged from writing articles about themselves. Your account was blocked not only because you were writing about yourself but in a manner that was excessively promotional. Statements like "I deserve to be included" and "reserve their natural unalienable rights" suggest that you do not have a complete grasp on the policies about editing when you have a conflict of interest.

Further, your username is not permissible under the username policy, as it is the name of a company. If you were to be unblocked, you would be required to change your user name. So, a question: what username would you request for your account if you were unblocked? —C.Fred (talk) 16:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cuetrax (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thank you! new user After more careful examination as to the causation for the block placed on the cuetrax page and the deletion of the edit or request to submit on my own behalf for consideration of addition as a wutang affiliated recording engineer producer and cameo artist I have elucidated the fact that my intentions were inadvertently in conflicting interest of present day policy defined by wiki, therefore, I will request that an administrator examine the facts and confirm the merit that my claims are legitimate after further investigation I will resubmit...I am still requesting to reinstate the username cuetrax in such that it is unblocked with the assurance that I will not abuse the handle for commercial promotional or advertisement purposes, however, to answer the question posed previously, in regards to what alternative, noncomercial, handle I am willing to appropriate the name shall be henceforth wrt availability, provided, if in fact that I cannot utilize the cuetrax name as a publisher to submit valuable non disruptive material. I have made use of and read the guide to appealing a block or deleted entry and supportive documentation and furthermore intend to make "neutral point of view" submissions on existing entries for which I am qualified with the consent of an administrator. Again I apologize for the interruption and hope to resume normal activity. Happy Wiking...please note the Cuetrax (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC) signature Cuetrax (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be slightly confused about the situation. Allow me to clarify. In order to be unblocked you will need to agree to both of the following:

  • you will not make any edits in regard to the subjects where you have a conflict of interest,
  • you will change your username to something unrelated to the subjects where you have a conflict of interest.

I hope this of some help in clarifying the situation. PhilKnight (talk) 20:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.