[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:DeafMan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, DeafMan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  The Neokid talk 17:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Identifying myself: DeafMan is David Langford. I thought I should start signing my occasional Wikipedia edits, though they'll probably remain infrequent. --DeafMan 09:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TransAtlantic Fan Fund nominated for deletion

[edit]

Thought you'd want to know. --Orange Mike 14:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning. I've been a bit distracted this month, and the problem had gone away again by the time I logged in and found your note! --DeafMan 14:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walk t'plank!

[edit]

(I've blanked this old comment because it causes formatting problems on latter commentsd.)--Peter cohen (talk) 23:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dave, The above article is up for deletion. I can't see anything in the Encyclopedia of Fantasy about this topic, does the SF version cover it either in current or forth coming versions?--Peter cohen (talk) 23:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Peter, it's been a while since I logged in. DISGUISE, SHAPESHIFTING and maybe ILLUSION are possibly relevant EoF entries. I intend to add SHAPESHIFTING in the sf sense to EoSF, to cover the many sf examples (mostly ALIENS). There is now an entry for HYPNOSIS which, along with the already existing PERCEPTION, covers some of the ground of "seeming to be what one is not". Calling the phenomenon "human disguise" seems a bit lumpish -- which is maybe why it's in disfavour. DeafMan (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]