User talk:Dia9 health

Welcome!

Hello, Dia9 health, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Dia9 health, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Grachester (talk) 04:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dia9 health

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Dia9 health requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Grachester (talk) 04:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ✗plicit 04:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dia9 health (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

We understand your concerns regarding the promotion of content on your platform. However, we would like to clarify that the Dia9 Health & Wellness Blog page does not aim to promote or sell any products or services. Instead, our primary goal is to provide an informative resource for the Wikipedia community and beyond.

Dia9 is a health and wellness blog founded and managed by experienced medical professionals. Our primary mission is to educate the public on various aspects of health and wellness, ranging from nutrition, fitness, and mental health to chronic conditions and alternative medicine. All the information provided is research-backed, with the objective of raising awareness and promoting healthier lifestyle choices.

We do not sell any products, nor do we endorse or suggest purchasing products from any external sources. The aim of our content is purely educational, intended to serve as a reliable source of information for those seeking to improve their health and well-being.

The information shared on our Wikipedia page is intended to reflect the work we do at Dia9, which aligns with Wikipedia's mission to provide free, reliable, and unbiased information. We hope this explanation clarifies our intentions and respectfully request a reconsideration of the block placed on our page.

Thank you for your understanding and consideration.

Best regards,

Pallav Gupta

Dia9 Health & Wellness Blog Dia9 health (talk) 04:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not proposed a new username as instructed, that reflects that this account is exclusively used by a single person.

You have several misunderstandings about Wikipedia and what we do here. Wikipedia does not claim its information is reliable, does not claim to be a reliable source, nor does it claim to be unbiased- which is impossible. Everyone has biases. Wikipedia presents sources to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves as to bias and other factors in determining what they think or believe.

Wikipedia is also not for merely providing information. It summarizes what independent reliable sources state about topics deemed notable by Wikipedia.

Your edits clearly promoted your blog. You don't have to be selling something. Please see WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, further edit about your blog. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you are interested in being a general contributor and editing about topics for which you have no conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your account name is the same as your website, which violates Wikipedia's username policy. Account names cannot represent companies, organizations, websites or groups of people. Accounts are for individuals, and the name must reflect individual use.

Furthermore, you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about Wikipedia's purpose. As stated in the conflict of interest guidelines:

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia's mission is to provide the public with articles that summarize accepted knowledge, written neutrally and sourced reliably. Readers expect to find neutral articles written independently of their subject, not corporate or personal webpages, or platforms for advertising and self-promotion. Articles should contain only material that complies with Wikipedia's content policies and best practices, and Wikipedians must place the interests of the encyclopedia and its readers above personal concerns.

Wikipedia is not a directory, so a company/organization/website is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. Simply using Wikipedia to publicize the existence a non-notable topic is considered promotion; you do not necessarily need to be selling goods or services.

Reliable sources are sources that have an proven reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. This heavily favours established, mainstream sources such as major news organizations, academic press, and reputable publishers of newspapers, books and magazines. Sources for biomedical content must conform to Wikipedia's reliable sources for medicine guidelines. Sources of unknown or dubious provenance, or self-published sources consisting of user-generated content will not be considered reliable. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]