User talk:Macadamia of the LeafWings

This user may have left Wikipedia. Macadamia of the LeafWings has not edited Wikipedia since October 6, 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

en:User:Meaghan/Sunshine

Welcome!

Hello, Ex-Borg Seven of Nine! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 13:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

@Theroadislong: thank you! Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ex-Borg Seven of Nine! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My Profile Page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uh

Ugliness is a synonym to unattractiveness, thus making your draft pointless. Le Panini ^Talk 15:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Panini: Oh. Thanks for letting me know. Oh, also, you should know: Seven of Nine is from Star Trek, not Marvel. 😉

Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 21:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Um, also I think I figured out the problem I had with my User Page and my Sandbox. When I tried to welcome a new User, that also didn't work. So I think I can't create new pages. Not sure why. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 21:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ex-Borg Seven of Nine, Wait; Star Trek? Dang. Le Panini ^Talk 22:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Panini: Star Trek Voyager, to be exact. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 22:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But she's also in Star Trek:Picard Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 22:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I love your collection of hilarious Teahouse questions. 'Specially "Capichino" and "Turkey" lol. 😄 Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ex-Borg Seven of Nine, Yes, the ones where the hosts collaborate as well are fun to read. Happy editing! Le Panini ^Talk 23:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custom sigs

I didn't want to overwrite your sandbox content so I'm posting here instead. I couldn't get proper cursive to render unfortunately. Do let me know if you've seen it working elsewhere.

Ex-Borg Seven of Nine _talk

Ex-Borg Seven of Nine ^talk

'Talk' will appear blue, it's just black because this is your talk page. I can override it but the sig will be much longer. The pink is faint on that second one but it's there. I can make it stand out more but I'd have to use non-responsive units and I'm not sure how they would appear on mobile. If there's any issues with your sig just blame me and i'll blame a lack of caffiene. Don't feel obliged to use those sigs, creating your own is fun. Zindor (talk) 14:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zindor: thanks! It's not exactly what is was picturing, but not bad! Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 14:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if there are improvements I can make. There's limitations within wikitext, but I might know how to make the changes. Zindor (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zindor: Okay. The pink is a bit grey, but that's about it. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, when I paste the wikitext in, it says there are problems with the input? Something about ending span tags. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 15:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll look into it. I was using a different method than usual. Gimme a few mins. Zindor (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, worked it out. I was trying an old school method to keep it shorter but must not work anymore. I'm having so much grief from my computer it'll be while before I can fix it. Zindor (talk) 15:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zindor: Okay, thanks. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 18:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hey, User:Bastique has cursive! Only on the first letter though. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lusa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black bear. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot: Aaaaargh I can't believe I did that!! The ONE TIME I forgot to check my links. Thanks for fixing. Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 12:50, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
4	Wat Rajabopit School (talk)	Add sources
70	Warriors: Omen of the Stars (talk)	Add sources
3	Artemy Tereshchenko (talk)	Add sources
32	The 13th Reality (talk)	Add sources
2,174	Hogwarts staff (talk)	Add sources
8	Eugen Ghica-Comănești (talk)	Add sources
250	The End (novel) (talk)	Cleanup
41	Qassim University (talk)	Cleanup
7	Greysteil (talk)	Cleanup
6	King's Quest II: Romancing the Stones (talk)	Expand
21	ICHD classification and diagnosis of migraine (talk)	Expand
14	The Silver Lining (video game) (talk)	Expand
15	Global Ports (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
405	State school (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
321	Freshman (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
10	Mantal (talk)	Merge
18	Student prank (talk)	Merge
114	Wizard rock (talk)	Merge
21	Oralman (talk)	Wikify
25	King's Quest II (talk)	Wikify
55	King's Quest: Mask of Eternity (talk)	Wikify
3	Arquibaldo e sua Turma (talk)	Orphan
140	Medieval female sexuality (talk)	Orphan
15	Sports-related traumatic brain injury (talk)	Orphan
152	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
175	Ellen Goldsmith-Vein (talk)	Stub
30	Sara Parriott (talk)	Stub
22	Val sans retour (talk)	Stub
2	Ghurko (talk)	Stub
6	Pollomuhku ja Posityyhtynen (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how to get another message. Rosefeather of WindClan (Meow at me!) 01:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need some help!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What is the point system for the WikiCup? How do I get points?

Rosefeather of WindClan (talk) 13:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The details of the contest can be viewed at Wikipedia:WikiCup, its scoring at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and its past newsletters at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, here's a little trick for navigation. Just about any feature of Wikipedia that is a part of the interface or that is mentioned behind the scenes by regular editors that has a fairly standardized name it's designated with, or called by, will almost always have a page at "Wikipedia:Name Used" (sometimes these pages may be in the Help: or other namespace, but the format "Wikipedia:Name Used" will still work as invariably redirecting to the correct page). Another trick here is to combine with this that "WP" works as an alias for "Wikipedia", saving typing time.

I have in a way proved the point already in this post – because the (piped links <--- I just did it again, with this link) I've provided above (and in this sentence) – to namespace, redirect and piped links respectively – were typed by me, and I knew would link to the right project pages without having to think about it, using: WP:namespace, WP:redirect and WP:Pipe. Additionally, almost always, there will be redirects for all versions of a given title a user is likely to type. Capitalization also usually doesn't matter.

So, all that is to say, since you already knew the name "WikiCup" when you asked your question above, you could have found it yourself by typing any of:

Wikipedia:WikiCup or WIKIPEDIA:WIKICUP or WP:WikiCup or WP:WIKICUP
Wikipedia:Wcup or WIKIPEDIA:WCUP or WP:Wcup or WP:WCUP
Wikipedia:Cup or WIKIPEDIA:CUP or WP:Cup or WP:CUP
Wikipedia:Wiki Cup or WP:Wiki Cup

or even a host of other variations of the name, so long as you followed the protocol of prefixing Wikipedia: / WP:. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fuhghettaboutit: Thanks for the help! (Also I thought you should know that my autocorrect tried to change your name to Finger tab out it)

Thanks, Rosefeather of WindClan (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!--Finger tab out it (talk) 15:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
659	Melanie Paxson (talk)	Add sources
35	Photosensitivity in humans (talk)	Add sources
18	Bluestar's Prophecy (talk)	Add sources
223	1944 (talk)	Add sources
47	Bravelands (talk)	Add sources
9	Thunder Rising (talk)	Add sources
30	Kleene algebra (talk)	Cleanup
249	Cactus (American band) (talk)	Cleanup
81	APL syntax and symbols (talk)	Cleanup
933	Negasonic Teenage Warhead (talk)	Expand
6,008	Family of Joe Biden (talk)	Expand
4,194	Irish people (talk)	Expand
50	Police Quest: SWAT (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
63	Wow/Grape Jam (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,094	Brian Kemp (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
135	Terrestrial locomotion (talk)	Merge
21	Collective mental state (talk)	Merge
41	Bristol Built-up Area (talk)	Merge
878	Magical objects in Harry Potter (talk)	Wikify
384	Toaster (talk)	Wikify
11	Arts in Rome (talk)	Wikify
2	Aurelio París Sanz de Santamaría (talk)	Orphan
14	Intuitive statistics (talk)	Orphan
9	Baiting crowd (talk)	Orphan
26	Cherith Baldry (talk)	Stub
53	CAE number (talk)	Stub
6	Shoffner Act (talk)	Stub
6	ᵵ (talk)	Stub
8	United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law (talk)	Stub
4	Reba Place Fellowship (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queen Iduna (Frozen) (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs to show where this character has received in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources, enough to show where she's independently notable of the film and the other characters. The coverage here seems to focus more on the film, the other characters, or on things unrelated to the film.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Queen Iduna (Frozen) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Queen Iduna (Frozen), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rosefeather of WindClan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,180	Transformers: War for Cybertron Trilogy (talk)	Add sources
43	Bravelands (talk)	Add sources
4	James L. Barry (talk)	Add sources
127	Bay St. Louis, Mississippi (talk)	Add sources
273	Maria Ressa (talk)	Add sources
4	Child of the Wolves (talk)	Add sources
270	101 Dalmatians: The Series (talk)	Cleanup
471	Cactus (American band) (talk)	Cleanup
93	Comparison of regular-expression engines (talk)	Cleanup
35	Brown v. Plata (talk)	Expand
260	YFN Lucci (talk)	Expand
3,940	Irish people (talk)	Expand
375	Surnames by country (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
27	Ticket balance (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
31	International Development Law Organization (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
98	Terrestrial locomotion (talk)	Merge
109	BTEC Extended Diploma (talk)	Merge
147	Darkforce (talk)	Merge
8	Arts in Rome (talk)	Wikify
280	Xiaomi Mi 11 (talk)	Wikify
334	Toaster (talk)	Wikify
3	Pilar Ramírez Tello (talk)	Orphan
4	Authority for Use of Military Force to Combat Terrorist Activities Within the United States (talk)	Orphan
12	Intuitive statistics (talk)	Orphan
2	Aurelio París Sanz de Santamaría (talk)	Stub
97	The Ride (2018 film) (talk)	Stub
25	Global System of Trade Preferences among Developing Countries (talk)	Stub
28	Cherith Baldry (talk)	Stub
66	Lincoln (novel) (talk)	Stub
165	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thor: Love and Thunder. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the link to your contributions in your signature does not work. Did you use the string Special:contribs/User:Macadamia of the LeafWings in the signature code, by any chance? The "User:" part shouldn't be there (compare: Special:contribs/User:Macadamia of the LeafWings and Special:contribs/Macadamia of the LeafWings), and I think that's why the link in your signature is broken. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead

No, I do not mind the edit. Do keep in mind I'm a Christian too ;) Panini!^🥪 00:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Hey! So I saw your username and I was curious what on earth a LeafWing is. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: It's a Wings of Fire thing. A dragon tribe.

Macadamia of the LeafWings | HEAR ME ROAR!! | Contribs | My Guestbook📖 15:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok! I've heard of Wings of Fire and thought that was what your name was after seeing your previous name was related to Warrior Cats (which I honestly despise but I will let people have their own opinions) but wanted to make sure that was actually what it was. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, Bobherry Talk Edits 14:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Missing wikipedians

Hey, I've listed you as missing because you haven't edited for 6 months. If you would like, I can remove you from the list. Rusty4321 ^{talk contributions log} 23:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birthday Commitee Removal due to Inactivity

Removal from member list

You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee birthday list. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.

Best wishes, --Isro! ^chatter 19:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Pyrrhia vs. Pantala

You say on your userpage that you are from Pyrrhia, in the info box. But you are a LeafWing! Shouldn’t you be from Pantala? 🤔

Shadestar474 ^(talk) 20:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadestar474 (talk page watcher) As said user isn't around currently, I'll answer this question.

While it could be an actual error, haven't you thought about Pantalan dragons migrating/immigrating to Pyrrhia?

Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 01:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a good point, @Rusty4321! Maybe they wanted to escape the tyranny of Queen Wasp and fled! Shadestar474 ^(talk) 02:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadestar474 I honestly hadn't thought about Queen Wasp! My mind was on the events of book thirteen and fourteen! Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 15:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, where Luna got caught up in the wind storm and sailed all the way to Pyrrhia! That was a good book. Shadestar474 ^(talk) 18:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]