User talk:Er.spcwlkr

This is Er.spcwlkr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Space Philic Pvt Ltd/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Space Philic Pvt Ltd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Space Philic Pvt Ltd/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Space Philic Pvt Ltd/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen328 (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir!

{{unblock-spamun|Indra Narayan Chaudhary|This was my first time at using wikipedia to create a page for the organisation. I am a no expert, I sincerely apologise if my actions have violated the wikipedia guidelines in any way. I humbly request that, please for my actions, don't block my account and the username as it belongs to the organisation and i don't wish for my organisation to face consequences due to my actions, leading to blocking of the username. I I had no intention whatsoever to use the account for advertising or promotion and i did not know that i cannot use the company name as the username. Please give me a second chance, i will not repeat the mistake again and will use this wikipedia platform to give a meaningful contribution to the society and i will respect the guidelines henceforth}} Space Philic Pvt Ltd (talk) 20:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir!

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Er.spcwlkr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Er.spcwlkr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

This was my first time at using wikipedia to create a page for the organisation. I am a no expert, I sincerely apologise if my actions have violated the wikipedia guidelines in any way. I humbly request that, please for my actions, don't block my account and the username as it belongs to the organisation and i don't wish for my organisation to face consequences due to my actions, leading to blocking of the username. I I had no intention whatsoever to use the account for advertising or promotion and i did not know that i cannot use the company name as the username. Please give me a second chance, i will not repeat the mistake again and will use this wikipedia platform to give a meaningful contribution to the society and i will respect the guidelines henceforth Space Philic Pvt Ltd (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've renamed you, but not unblocked you, and I decline to do so here. Editing in that topic area seems to fall squarely within your conflict of interest, especially if it involves your company. You will not be permitted to, in the short term, edit in that area, we will want to first see edits in other areas unrelated to your conflict of interest to show your understanding of relevant Wikipedia content and sourcing requirements, before permitting you to indirectly contribute in the area of your COI. You will also need to declare as a paid editor as I assume you derive a living from your company. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed your account. What contributions do you want to make(such as what articles or topic areas)? 331dot (talk) 09:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for unblocking me. I want to make contributions to the spacetech sector in the field of sustainability and launch vehicles through my startup. Er.spcwlkr (talk) 10:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sure. Can you guide me as to how should i proceed? Thanking you in anticipation. Er.spcwlkr (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have other topics that have nothing to do with your conflict of interest that you want to, in the short term, edit about, you may make a new request telling us what those might be. If you don't, this is probably the end of the line, although you can still make another unblock request to try to convince a different admin to unblock you. My review is not the final word, and the next admin will make any decision on a new request. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sure. I am a mechanical engineer and have done a business masters. I wish to write an short article about strategic consulting. Er.spcwlkr (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then please make a new unblock request. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do i make a new unblock request? I can't use the previous template as i already got a new username. Er.spcwlkr (talk) 10:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use the second template described in the block notice. 331dot (talk) 23:38, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I am really sorry if my actions have led you people to block my account from editing. I am a new user, i was really unaware and might have violated the policies because of it. Kindly help me understand and let me know how will i be unblocked. Space Philic Pvt Ltd (talk) 19:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]