User talk:Fulljourney

July 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fulljourney (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

WhqII (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I didn't know that username wasn't allowed

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did and someone replied to me. If you want to leave me banned, fine, but I honestly, did not know what I was doing was bad, and I even requested to change my name. IDK what else I can say. Thank you for your consideration and wish you the best! :)

I am not paid by Fulljourney. I was adding content about Charles McCarthy who owns Fulljourney and is a new AI company. his wiki page was incomplete. I used the Fulljourney name so it look like it came from him or his company. I am not trying to advertise anything, I was explaining his venture and what the company does. There was no mention of asking peopel to sign up or anything like that, I was just trying to be detailed.

Hi Fulljourney, you've been promoting the company as a fan, I assume. I then also believe that you haven't done so intentionally. Sadly, your enthusiasm led to either a copyright violation or very promotional speech, in Special:Diff/1164560745.

Please have a look at the first paragraph of your edit. Where do the words "comprehensive" and "capabilities" come from: Did you write these yourself or did you copy them from somewhere? If copied, please specify the exact source. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They don't even have a page outside of their login to discord. I wrote it myself. check out their site - https://www.fulljourney.ai/ they have like 2 sentences on there. also some other fan did a youtube video on them also which I used as reference. Fulljourney (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A company must have already received extensive coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the company itself to be considered notable enough for inclusion. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself. Social media is also disqualified as a source because it is self-published with no editorial oversight (unless it's the official account of an existing reliable source, such as a mainstream news organization). --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]