User talk:Guerino Symons
This is Guerino Symons's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Only warnings
[edit]I realise k6ka did not vandalise here. User giving out warning, without giving proper reason - probably a robot of some sort
Why did you leave an only warning for this edit? I'm not seeing anything in that edit that would warrant an only warning. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Same with this edit, which is not vandalism and should not have been issued an only warning for vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Guerino Symons, please address these concerns before continuing to make reverts. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- What concerns? Those edits were absolutely vandalism. 100%. I will not be stopping simply because you are "concerned". Guerino Symons (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- How is this edit vandalism? How is that egregious enough for an only warning? You evidently do not know the definition of vandalism on Wikipedia, which is to intentionally make unconstructive edits with the intention of disrupting Wikipedia. The edits you are reverting do not meet this criteria. You must be able to explain your edits, or risk being blocked from editing. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Consider this a polite request to (Redacted) AND MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. Guerino Symons (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seems like this user is a troll that reverts constructive edits and does personal attacks to other users. He should be reported and blocked promptly. 223.19.66.218 (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Consider this a polite request to (Redacted) AND MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. Guerino Symons (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- How is this edit vandalism? How is that egregious enough for an only warning? You evidently do not know the definition of vandalism on Wikipedia, which is to intentionally make unconstructive edits with the intention of disrupting Wikipedia. The edits you are reverting do not meet this criteria. You must be able to explain your edits, or risk being blocked from editing. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- What concerns? Those edits were absolutely vandalism. 100%. I will not be stopping simply because you are "concerned". Guerino Symons (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Guerino Symons, please address these concerns before continuing to make reverts. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Stop stalking and threatening other users
[edit](from another user) I agree with this user, this guerino acts like a robot and reverts does not comply with wikipedia rules
Listen here, stop threatening and harassing other users. You are disrupting other users' experience by threatening them that they are vandalizing articles on Wikipedia. Remember the threat you sent to my sister threatening to block her over her editing of the Onoe Shōroku II article? Well then, it won't stay that way, as I'm one step away from reporting you for a veiled threat. Explain to me why you threatened her? MafiaBoy123 (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- No you listen here. You mind your own business and STOP VANDALISING. Guerino Symons (talk) 13:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- None of the content that the user added to that page was vandalism, as such I have removed those warnings @MafiaBoy123. I would seriously advise responding to the messages you've been left above. CommissarDoggoTalk? 13:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- FUCK OFF the pair of you. Guerino Symons (talk) 13:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sir
- can you also remove my warning from him too
- i would be appreciatibe of it . 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:69C2:82B1:32E0:D62B (talk) 13:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will, yes, but I also have to discuss something with you which I shall do on your talk page. CommissarDoggoTalk? 13:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- thank you my friend
- i apoligize for editing
- its a mistake i hope i am forgiven 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:69C2:82B1:32E0:D62B (talk) 13:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- yes sure
- i apologize
- i had to idea there was two pages of film toofan
- i am apologizing 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:69C2:82B1:32E0:D62B (talk) 13:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will, yes, but I also have to discuss something with you which I shall do on your talk page. CommissarDoggoTalk? 13:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- None of the content that the user added to that page was vandalism, as such I have removed those warnings @MafiaBoy123. I would seriously advise responding to the messages you've been left above. CommissarDoggoTalk? 13:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Unblock request
[edit]Guerino Symons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unblock me right now! I was reverting vandalism, it's an ABSOLUTE DISGRACE that I've been blocked for that Guerino Symons (talk) 13:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I think you've had enough chances to prove that you're not a troll. You can still appeal via UTRS, as below, but I think you should prove that you're not a troll before someone restores your talk page access. Special:Diff/1223029826, Special:Diff/1223030654, and Special:Diff/1223031408 need to be addressed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Bubble Football - Bubble Soccer
[edit]Your story about bubble football/ bubble soccer is false. Check out my website and read the real story. https://www.bubble-soccer.com/story The bubble soccer story is coming to the movies soon and will expose the truth and make fun of anyone who can't do proper research along the way.
Te true Story is:Bubble Soccer-Bubble Fußball and the inflatable game device, the Loopyball, was invented in 2010 by Lenka and Gerd Zweigler in Germany. In June 2011, the two inventors presented the Bubble Football TV world premiere on ZDF Fernsehgarten in front of an audience of millions. Loona, Mareijke Amado, Harry Wijnvoord, Ulrike von der Gröben, Mickie Krause and citizen Lars Dietrich took part. In addition to bubble soccer, Loopyball also offers many other fun and crazy games such as competitions and battles. For more on the story, see bubble-soccer.com/story 2A02:8071:6740:DEC0:9943:3D82:EC70:FFEB (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)