User talk:Gamren
Welcome
[edit]
|
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inger Støjberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viborg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gamren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Uddannelsesloftet
[edit]Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Gamren, thanks for creating Uddannelsesloftet!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please can you explain this more so that readers living outside Denmark can better understand what is involved.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
You are clearly more familiar with it than me; I have read it once, but it has thankfully mostly escaped my head. As such I think you are better positioned to edit the plot section than me; but I must ask that you direct your attention, if possible, to summarising it more compactly. The plot section is already over-long and the addition of minor details doesn't improve that. Sorry that I did not make this request when you first started. Pinkbeast (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Pinkbeast: I agree that the pensieve detail was unnecessary. I've tried removing this and some other non-essential details, in particular many of the misspellings. "Correcting" Bombadil to Riddle is a little problematic, since "Tom Riddle/Rid" is a separate character, but then again he's minor and non-essential.__Gamren (talk) 11:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not saying to take out anything that's necessary, and I appreciate that a short summary is difficult given the rambling nature of the plot. :-/ Pinkbeast (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Pinkbeast: Actually, I feel like the plot point of Cornelia Fuck and Doris Rumbridge should be included, because they sort of vaguely resemble the events of Order of the Phoenix. In case you've forgotten: they try to convince Dumbledore to close the school and retire because "[his] alzheimers is dangerous". Later, they send him to Azkaban because "he is old and week he has kancer". They then send Trevolry there, for being too "gottik", and immediately bring Dumbledore back to teach her class. I'll leave it to your discretion, though.__Gamren (talk) 18:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not saying to take out anything that's necessary, and I appreciate that a short summary is difficult given the rambling nature of the plot. :-/ Pinkbeast (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gamren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Brunsviger moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Brunsviger, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 09:47, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Brunsviger moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Brunsviger, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
[edit] Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Masturbation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also see WP:ONEWAY. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Brunsviger
[edit]Hello, Gamren. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brunsviger".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 10:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]March 2021
[edit] Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Gamren
Thank you for creating Greenlandic phonology.
User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hi, the lead is not the best.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creepTalk 06:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)